Cited by 36Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeLanguage Development and Disorders

Is reasoning from counterfactual antecedents evidence for counterfactual reasoning?

Open access
Rafetseder, Eva, Perner, Josef·2010·Thinking & Reasoning

Abstract

In most developmental studies the only error children could make on counterfactual tasks was to answer with the current state of affairs. It was concluded that children who did not show this error are able to reason counterfactually. However, children might have avoided this error by using basic conditional reasoning (Rafetseder, Cristi-Vargas, & Perner, 2010). Basic conditional reasoning takes an antecedent, which like in counterfactual reasoning can be counter to fact, and combines it with a conditional (or set of conditionals reflecting knowledge of how the world works) to draw a likely conclusion. A critical feature of counterfactual reasoning then is that these additional assumptions be modelled after the actual events to which the counterfactual is taken to be counterfactual. In contrast in basic conditional reasoning one enriches the given antecedent with any plausible assumptions. In our tasks basic conditional reasoning leads to different answers than counterfactual reasoning. For instance, a doctor, sitting in the park with the intention to read a paper, is called to an emergency at the swimming pool. The question, "if there had been no emergency, where would the doctor be?" should counterfactually be answered "in the park". But ignoring the doctor's intentions and just reasoning on plausible grounds one might answer: "in the hospital". Only by 6 years, did children give mostly correct answers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13546783.2010.488074

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One location change targets basic conditional reasoning and two location changes target mature CFR; answers to basic conditional reasoning and mature reasoning are the same for typical locations but not atypical locations.

    “The distinction between locations is important as one location change targets basic conditional reasoning and two location changes target mature CFR. Answers to basic conditional reasoning and mature reasoning are the same for typical locations but not atypical locations.”

    From A plausible role of imagination in pretend play, counterfactual reasoning, and executive functions (2023) · cites this paper as Rafetseder & Perner, 2010

    The Results (Age differences; page unavailable) distinguish basic conditional reasoning from counterfactual reasoning: children classified as using basic conditional reasoning answered correctly in three conditions and made typical-location errors only in the two-alternative, atypical condition. Thus the strategies differ for that specific atypical condition, not for atypical locations generally; they produce the same answer in the one-alternative, atypical condition. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Au TK Semin GR Fiedler K Counterfactual Reasoning Language, Interaction and Social Cognition 1992 194 213 Sage Publications London
  2. Beck SR Riggs KJ Gorniak SL The effect of causal chain length on counterfactual conditional reasoning British Journal of Developmental Psychology (in press) 20849031
  3. Beck SR Robinson EJ Carroll DJ Apperly IA Children’s Thinking About Counterfactuals and Future Hypotheticals as Possibilities Child Development 2006 77 413 426 16611181
  4. Barrouillet P Gauffroy C Lecas JF Mental models and the suppositional account of conditionals Psychological Review 2008 115 760 771 18729598
  5. Bennett J A philosophical guide to conditionals 2003 Oxford University Press Oxford
  6. Evans J. St. B. T. The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006 13 378 395 17048720
  7. Evans J. St. B. T. Handley SJ Over DE Conditionals and conditional probability Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003 29 321 335 12696819
  8. Evans J. St. B. T. Over DE If 2004 Oxford University Press Oxford
  9. Fugard AJB Pfeifer N Mayerhofer B Kleiter G How people interpret conditionals: Shifts towards the conditional event 2010 Manuscript submitted for publication 21534706
  10. Gauffroy C Barrouillet P Heuristic and analytic processes in mental models for conditionals: An integrative developmental theory Developmental Review 2009 29 249 282
  11. Goodman N Fact, fiction, and forecast 1983 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA 4th ed
  12. Guttentag R Ferrell J Reality Compared With Its Alternatives: Age Differences in Judgments of Regret and Relief Developmental Psychology 2004 40 764 775 15355164
  13. Harris PL German T Mills P Children’s use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning Cognition 1996 61 233 259 8990973
  14. Lewis D Counterfactuals 1973 Blackwell Oxford
  15. Oberauer K Wilhelm O The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models, and personal utilities Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003 29 680 693 12924867
  16. Over DE Hadjichristidis C Evan J. St. B. T. Handley SJ Sloman SA The probability of causal conditionals Cognitive Psychology 2007 54 62 97 16839539
  17. Perner J Mitchell P Riggs KJ About + Belief + Counterfactual Children’s reasoning and the mind 2000 367 401 Psychology Press Hove, East Sussex
  18. Perner J Rafetseder E Hoerl C McCormack T Beck SR Counterfactual and other forms of conditional reasoning: Children Lost in the Nearest Possible World Understanding Counterfactuals/ Understanding Causation 2010 Oxford University Press New York, NY Manuscript submitted for publication
  19. Rafetseder E Christi-Vargas R Perner J Counterfactual Reasoning: Developing a sense of “nearest possible world” Child Development 2010 81 362 375 PMC3201838 20331674
  20. Rafetseder E Perner J Counterfactual Reasoning: From Childhood to Adulthood 2009 Manuscript submitted for publication PMC3582172 23219156
  21. Ramsey FP Mellor DH General propositions and causality Philosophical papers 1990 145 163 Cambridge University Press Cambridge (Original work published 1931)
  22. Riggs KJ Peterson DM Mitchell P Riggs KJ Counterfactual thinking in pre-school children: Mental state and causal inferences Children’s reasoning and the mind 2000 87 99 Psychology Press Hove, East Sussex
  23. Robinson EJ Beck S Mitchell P Riggs KJ What is difficult about counterfactual reasoning? Children’s reasoning and the mind 2000 101 119 Psychology Press Hove, East Sussex
  24. Schaller T Theory of Mind und Kontrafaktische Denken im Alter von 3–5 Jahren 2004 University of Salzburg Austria Unpublished master’s thesis
  25. Stalnaker R Jackson F A Theory of Conditionals Conditionals 1991 98 112 Oxford University Press Oxford (Original work published 1968)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rafetseder, E., & Perner, J.
Affiliations
University of Salzburg (AT)
Corresponding author
Rafetseder, Eva
Venue
Thinking & Reasoning
Published
2010-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
131-155
ISSN
  • 1354-6783 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0708
OpenAlex
W2170037215
Cited by
36
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thinking & Reasoning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
counterfactual reasoning, children's reasoning, conditional reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review