Is reasoning from counterfactual antecedents evidence for counterfactual reasoning?
Open accessAbstract
In most developmental studies the only error children could make on counterfactual tasks was to answer with the current state of affairs. It was concluded that children who did not show this error are able to reason counterfactually. However, children might have avoided this error by using basic conditional reasoning (Rafetseder, Cristi-Vargas, & Perner, 2010). Basic conditional reasoning takes an antecedent, which like in counterfactual reasoning can be counter to fact, and combines it with a conditional (or set of conditionals reflecting knowledge of how the world works) to draw a likely conclusion. A critical feature of counterfactual reasoning then is that these additional assumptions be modelled after the actual events to which the counterfactual is taken to be counterfactual. In contrast in basic conditional reasoning one enriches the given antecedent with any plausible assumptions. In our tasks basic conditional reasoning leads to different answers than counterfactual reasoning. For instance, a doctor, sitting in the park with the intention to read a paper, is called to an emergency at the swimming pool. The question, "if there had been no emergency, where would the doctor be?" should counterfactually be answered "in the park". But ignoring the doctor's intentions and just reasoning on plausible grounds one might answer: "in the hospital". Only by 6 years, did children give mostly correct answers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One location change targets basic conditional reasoning and two location changes target mature CFR; answers to basic conditional reasoning and mature reasoning are the same for typical locations but not atypical locations.
“The distinction between locations is important as one location change targets basic conditional reasoning and two location changes target mature CFR. Answers to basic conditional reasoning and mature reasoning are the same for typical locations but not atypical locations.”
From A plausible role of imagination in pretend play, counterfactual reasoning, and executive functions (2023) · cites this paper as Rafetseder & Perner, 2010
The Results (Age differences; page unavailable) distinguish basic conditional reasoning from counterfactual reasoning: children classified as using basic conditional reasoning answered correctly in three conditions and made typical-location errors only in the two-alternative, atypical condition. Thus the strategies differ for that specific atypical condition, not for atypical locations generally; they produce the same answer in the one-alternative, atypical condition. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Au TK Semin GR Fiedler K Counterfactual Reasoning Language, Interaction and Social Cognition 1992 194 213 Sage Publications London
- Beck SR Riggs KJ Gorniak SL The effect of causal chain length on counterfactual conditional reasoning British Journal of Developmental Psychology (in press) 20849031
- Beck SR Robinson EJ Carroll DJ Apperly IA Children’s Thinking About Counterfactuals and Future Hypotheticals as Possibilities Child Development 2006 77 413 426 16611181
- Barrouillet P Gauffroy C Lecas JF Mental models and the suppositional account of conditionals Psychological Review 2008 115 760 771 18729598
- Bennett J A philosophical guide to conditionals 2003 Oxford University Press Oxford
- Evans J. St. B. T. The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006 13 378 395 17048720
- Evans J. St. B. T. Handley SJ Over DE Conditionals and conditional probability Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003 29 321 335 12696819
- Evans J. St. B. T. Over DE If 2004 Oxford University Press Oxford
- Fugard AJB Pfeifer N Mayerhofer B Kleiter G How people interpret conditionals: Shifts towards the conditional event 2010 Manuscript submitted for publication 21534706
- Gauffroy C Barrouillet P Heuristic and analytic processes in mental models for conditionals: An integrative developmental theory Developmental Review 2009 29 249 282
- Goodman N Fact, fiction, and forecast 1983 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA 4th ed
- Guttentag R Ferrell J Reality Compared With Its Alternatives: Age Differences in Judgments of Regret and Relief Developmental Psychology 2004 40 764 775 15355164
- Harris PL German T Mills P Children’s use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning Cognition 1996 61 233 259 8990973
- Lewis D Counterfactuals 1973 Blackwell Oxford
- Oberauer K Wilhelm O The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models, and personal utilities Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003 29 680 693 12924867
- Over DE Hadjichristidis C Evan J. St. B. T. Handley SJ Sloman SA The probability of causal conditionals Cognitive Psychology 2007 54 62 97 16839539
- Perner J Mitchell P Riggs KJ About + Belief + Counterfactual Children’s reasoning and the mind 2000 367 401 Psychology Press Hove, East Sussex
- Perner J Rafetseder E Hoerl C McCormack T Beck SR Counterfactual and other forms of conditional reasoning: Children Lost in the Nearest Possible World Understanding Counterfactuals/ Understanding Causation 2010 Oxford University Press New York, NY Manuscript submitted for publication
- Rafetseder E Christi-Vargas R Perner J Counterfactual Reasoning: Developing a sense of “nearest possible world” Child Development 2010 81 362 375 PMC3201838 20331674
- Rafetseder E Perner J Counterfactual Reasoning: From Childhood to Adulthood 2009 Manuscript submitted for publication PMC3582172 23219156
- Ramsey FP Mellor DH General propositions and causality Philosophical papers 1990 145 163 Cambridge University Press Cambridge (Original work published 1931)
- Riggs KJ Peterson DM Mitchell P Riggs KJ Counterfactual thinking in pre-school children: Mental state and causal inferences Children’s reasoning and the mind 2000 87 99 Psychology Press Hove, East Sussex
- Robinson EJ Beck S Mitchell P Riggs KJ What is difficult about counterfactual reasoning? Children’s reasoning and the mind 2000 101 119 Psychology Press Hove, East Sussex
- Schaller T Theory of Mind und Kontrafaktische Denken im Alter von 3–5 Jahren 2004 University of Salzburg Austria Unpublished master’s thesis
- Stalnaker R Jackson F A Theory of Conditionals Conditionals 1991 98 112 Oxford University Press Oxford (Original work published 1968)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Counterfactual reasoning: From childhood to adulthood
Rafetseder, E., Schwitalla, M., & Perner, J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.010 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
“Although the gain of inhibitory control might serve as an explanation for why children stop committing the reality bias on false belief and counterfactual questions (see also Rafetseder & Perner, 2010), it hardly explains why even older children give wrong answers on our critical conditions.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe development of mental scenario building and episodic foresight
Suddendorf, T., & Redshaw, J. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12189 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Developing intuitions about free will between ages four and six
Kushnir, T., Alison Gopnik, C., Chernyak, N., Seiver, E., & Wellman, H. M. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.003 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“First, by age six children have advanced in their ability to flexibly switch between multiple perspectives (Munakata, Snyder, & Chatham, 2012; Zelazo, 2004) and show increasing sophistication in counterfactual reasoning (Rafetseder & Perner, 2010).”
BackgroundMature counterfactual reasoning in 4- and 5-year-olds
Nyhout, A., & Ganea, P. A. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.027 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
False belief and counterfactual reasoning in a social environment
Hoeck, N. V., Begtas, E., Steen, J., Kestemont, J., Vandekerckhove, M. M. P., & Overwalle, F. V. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.043 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“…I would have passed the exam " ) nor do we create a " general possible " event by applying typical regularities (basic conditional reasoning; e.g., studying long enough), because they may not always provide a better outcome (i.e., since you studied the wrong chapters; Rafetseder and Perner, 2010).”
BackgroundCounterfactual Reasoning: Sharpening Conceptual Distinctions in Developmental Studies
Rafetseder, E., & Perner, J. (2014) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12061 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“…5-year-olds (and even older children) have problems answering in accordance with CFR when one controls for false positives, provided by simpler reasoning strategies that lead to the same answer as CFR (Rafetseder, Cristi-Vargas, & Perner, 2010; Rafetseder & Perner, 2010; Rafetseder et al., 2013).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationThe development of counterfactual reasoning about doubly-determined events
McCormack, T., Ho, M., Gribben, C., O’Connor, E., & Hoerl, C. (2017) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.001 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
A taxonomy of mental time travel and counterfactual thought: Insights from cognitive development.
Gautam, S., Suddendorf, T., Henry, J., & Redshaw, J. (2019) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112108 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Children's Counterfactual Reasoning About Causally Overdetermined Events
Nyhout, A., Henke, L., & Ganea, P. A. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12913 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Counterfactual curiosity in preschool children
FitzGibbon, L., Moll, H., Carboni, J., Lee, R. C., & Dehghani, M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.022 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“…conditional relations (e.g., ‘‘if rain, then wet grass/if no rain, then dry grass”; see Rafetseder et al., 2013) does not yield the right answer, for example, when events are doubly determined (Nyhout, Henke, & Ganea, 2017) or do not conform to behavioral regularities (Rafetseder & Perner, 2010).”
Possible Worlds Semantics for Indicative and Counterfactual Conditionals?
Unterhuber, M. (2013) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110323665 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“So far we focused on default logics in line with Reiter (1980) in proof-theoretic terms.”
BackgroundMethodStatistical and perceptual updating: correlated impairments in right brain injury
Stöttinger, E., Filipowicz, A., Marandi, E., Quehl, N., Danckert, J. A., & Anderson, B. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3887-z · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“…2011), modeling the mental states of others (Perner 1991; Vogeley et al. 2001) and mental simulation (e.g., counterfactual reasoning; Byrne 2002; Rafetseder and Perner 2010). critically, when incoming information does not match predictions generated by our models, we first need to detect this…”
ResultInfluentialRafetseder, E., & Perner, J. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000327 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“This finding replicated a previous set of studies (Rafetseder, Cristi-Vargas, & Perner, 2010; Rafetseder & Perner, 2010) and the authors argued that children approach counterfactual questions differently from adults.”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationRicco, R. B. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy213 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Dangerous Ground: One-Year-Old Infants are Sensitive to Peril in Other Agents’ Action Plans
Liu, S., Pepe, B., Kumar, M. G., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Spelke, E. S. (2022) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00063 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“The development of counterfactual and hypothetical reasoning remains controversial (e.g., Carey et al., 2020; Harris et al., 1996; Kominsky et al., 2021; Nyhout & Ganea, 2018; Rafetseder & Perner, 2010).”
BackgroundGraham, A. J., McCormack, T., Burns, P., & Caruso, E. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104704 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A plausible role of imagination in pretend play, counterfactual reasoning, and executive functions
Francis, G. A., & Gibson, J. L. (2023) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12650 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“The Location Change Task used was developed by Rafetseder and Perner (2010) and reflects a modified version of a location change task originally developed by Riggs et al. (1998).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInterpersonal regret and prosocial risk taking in children
Corbett, B., Feeney, A., & McCormack, T. (2021) · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101036 · Cited by 13
Young children's counterfactual thinking: Triggered by the negative emotions of others.
Nakamichi, K. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.06.012 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Belief ascription and the Ramsey test
Krzyżanowska, K. (2012) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0160-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…between counterfactual reasoning and 10 The role of the constraints that the actual world imposes on the possible alternatives in the process of counterfactual reasoning has been experimentally investigated in Rafetseder et al. (2010); Rafetseder and Perner (2010) and Perner and Rafetseder (2011).”
Stragà, M., Faiella, A., Santini, I., & Ferrante, D. (2022) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2022.2130428 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Baquero, L. A. Q., Vargas, M. A. P., & dos Santos, C. V. (2014) · doi:10.1080/15021149.2014.11434511 · Cited by 2
“…most of them have focused on the expectations of the participants to change their behavior (Kray et al., 2010; Markman, Elizaga, & Ratcliff, 2007; Rafetseder & Perner, 2010, among many others) rather than behavior change in itself, since the preparations often involve exposing participants to…”
BackgroundWu, Y. (2024) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2024.2430194 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“For example, a doctor read in the park, received an emergency call, ran to the hospital to fetch the first-aid bag, and hurried to the swimming pool to attend to a hurt child (Rafetseder & Perner, 2010).”
InfluentialHsu, C.-F. (2017) · Lingua Sinica · doi:10.1186/s40655-017-0031-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
An empirical investigation of the construct validity of counterfactual reasoning tasks
Wu, Y. (2026) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2026.101757
Counterfactual Reasoning Development in Different Languages
Wu, Y. (2025) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12549
Getting counterfactuals right: the perspective of the causal reasoner
Popa, E. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03492-6
“This involves a more complex structure of counterfactual thought, namely creating an alternative scenario and integrating it with previous information (Rafetseder & Perner 2010).”
MethodKokavec, V. M., & Cramer, K. (2018) · Athens Journal of Law · doi:10.30958/ajl.4.2.2
“2 Roese (1997). 3 Kray, Galinsky & Markman (2007). 4 Epstude & Roese (2008). 5 Alicke, Buckingham, Zell & Davis (2008); Roese (1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialMurcia, A. (2016) · Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología · doi:10.1080/02109395.2015.1122436
“Existen dos enfoques principales que abordan ese tema: el primero propone que el PC es el resultado de un extenso desarrollo que finaliza en torno a los 13 años, edad en la que se ha probado su uso maduro (Rafetseder & Perner, 2010; Rafetseder et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Rafetseder, E., & Perner, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Salzburg (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Rafetseder, Eva
- Venue
- Thinking & Reasoning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-155
- ISSN
- 1354-6783 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0708
- PMC
- PMC3242030
- OpenAlex
- W2170037215
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Thinking & Reasoning (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- counterfactual reasoning, children's reasoning, conditional reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review