Is the Charcot and Bernard case (1883) of loss of visual imagery really based on neurological impairment?
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The Charcot and Bernard case of visual imagery, Monsieur X, is a classic case in the history of neuropsychology. Published in 1883, it has been considered the first case of visual imagery loss due to brain injury. Also in recent times a neurological valence has been given to it. However, the presence of analogous cases of loss of visual imagery in the psychiatric field have led us to hypothesise functional origins rather than organic. METHODS. In order to assess the validity of such an inference, we have compared the symptomatology of Monsieur X with that found in cases of loss of visual mental images, both psychiatric and neurological, presented in literature. RESULTS. The clinical findings show strong assonances of the Monsieur X case with the symptoms manifested over time by the patients with functionally based loss of visual imagery. CONCLUSION. Although Monsieur X's damage was initially interpreted as neurological, reports of similar symptoms in the psychiatric field lead us to postulate a functional cause for his impairment as well.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Loss of imagery due to neurological and psychiatric disorder was described in a series of case reports from the 1880s onwards.
“Although loss of imagery due to neurological and psychiatric disorder was described in a series of case reports from the 1880s onwards”
From Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Cites
Zeman, A. Z. J., Della Sala, S., Torrens, L. A., Gountouna, V.-E., McGonigle, D. J., & Logie, R. H. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.024 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
The phenomenological stability of depersonalization: comparing the old with the new
SIERRA, M., & BERRIOS, G. E. (2001) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-200109000-00010 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes
Zeman, A. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.007 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zago, S., Allegri, N., Cristoffanini, M., Ferrucci, R., Porta, M., & Priori, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Zago, Stefano
- Venue
- Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 481-504
- ISSN
- 1354-6805 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0619
- OpenAlex
- W1984192106
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- visual imagery, history of neuropsychology
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Imagination, Male, Memory Disorders, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Neuropsychology, Visual Perception, Recognition, Psychology, History, 19th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review