Cited by 25Neurology and Historical StudiesHallucinations in medical conditionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Is the Charcot and Bernard case (1883) of loss of visual imagery really based on neurological impairment?

Zago, Stefano, Allegri, Nicola, Cristoffanini, Marta, Ferrucci, Roberta, Porta, Mauro, Priori, Alberto·2011·Cognitive Neuropsychiatry

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The Charcot and Bernard case of visual imagery, Monsieur X, is a classic case in the history of neuropsychology. Published in 1883, it has been considered the first case of visual imagery loss due to brain injury. Also in recent times a neurological valence has been given to it. However, the presence of analogous cases of loss of visual imagery in the psychiatric field have led us to hypothesise functional origins rather than organic. METHODS. In order to assess the validity of such an inference, we have compared the symptomatology of Monsieur X with that found in cases of loss of visual mental images, both psychiatric and neurological, presented in literature. RESULTS. The clinical findings show strong assonances of the Monsieur X case with the symptoms manifested over time by the patients with functionally based loss of visual imagery. CONCLUSION. Although Monsieur X's damage was initially interpreted as neurological, reports of similar symptoms in the psychiatric field lead us to postulate a functional cause for his impairment as well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13546805.2011.556024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss of imagery due to neurological and psychiatric disorder was described in a series of case reports from the 1880s onwards.

    “Although loss of imagery due to neurological and psychiatric disorder was described in a series of case reports from the 1880s onwards”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zago, S., Allegri, N., Cristoffanini, M., Ferrucci, R., Porta, M., & Priori, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio (IT)
Corresponding author
Zago, Stefano
Venue
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
Published
2011-11
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
481-504
ISSN
  • 1354-6805 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0619
OpenAlex
W1984192106
Cited by
25
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
visual imagery, history of neuropsychology
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Imagination, Male, Memory Disorders, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Neuropsychology, Visual Perception, Recognition, Psychology, History, 19th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review