The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The capacity of the extended family safety net for orphans in Africa
Abstract
This paper reviews published studies on orphans and describes indicators by which weakened or saturated extended family safety nets can be identified. Most orphans in Africa are still being cared for by members of their extended family. The traditional safety net for orphans in Africa used to be their aunts and uncles. The alternate safety net of grandparents or more distant relatives is becoming prevalent as a result of weakening of the extended family and increasing orphan numbers; comparative data on uncle/aunt:grandparent caregiver rates are presented. Indicators of the strength of the extended family safety net include the prevalence of widow remarriage, purposive fostering and contact with relatives. Measures of the weakening of the safety net include the paternal:maternal caregiver ratio, the uncle/aunt:grandparent caregiver ratio, the prevalence of child-headed households, sibling dispersal and migration. Increasing numbers of children are slipping through the extended family safety net, leading to child-headed households, street children and child labour; such children have increased likelihood of physical, social, economic and psychological morbidity and vulnerability to HIV infection. It is essential to understand extended family safety net mechanisms so that proposed orphan initiatives support rather than undermine traditional orphan care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coimbra Jr., C. E. A. (1992) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0102-311x1992000400016 · Cited by 1,198
Iliffe, J. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511584121 · Cited by 672
Journal of Social Development in Africa
(2014) · African Studies Companion Online · doi:10.1163/1872-9037_afco_asc_656 · Cited by 506
AIDS in Africa: its present and future impact
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-0606 · Cited by 338
Parenthood and Social Reproduction: Fostering and Occupational Roles in West Africa
Launay, R., & Goody, E. N. (1982) · Man · doi:10.2307/2802061 · Cited by 321
The impact of HIV/AIDS on the family and other significant relationships: The African clan revisited
Ankrah, E. M. (1993) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540129308258580 · Cited by 214
The psychological effect of orphanhood: a study of orphans in Rakai district.
Sengendo, J., & Nambi, J. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 208
Orphan prevalence and extended family care in a peri-urban community in Zimbabwe
Foster, G., Shakespeare, R., Chinemana, F., Jackson, H., Gregson, S., Marange, C., & Mashumba, S. (1995) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540129550126911 · Cited by 183
Self-citationFactors leading to the establishment of child-headed households: the case of Zimbabwe
Foster, G., Makufa, C., Drew, R., & Kralovec, E. (1997) · ANU Open Research (Australian National University) · Cited by 149
Self-citationSupporting children in need through a community-based orphan visiting programme
Foster, G., Makufa, C., Drew, R. S., Kambeu, S., & Saurombe, K. (1996) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540129650125597 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Cited by
Gayapersad, A., Ombok, C., Kamanda, A., Tarus, C., Ayuku, D., & Braitstein, P. (2019) · Child & Youth Care Forum · doi:10.1007/s10566-019-09506-8 · Cited by 21
The Buffering Role of Social Support on the Psychosocial Wellbeing of Orphans in Rwanda
Caserta, T. A., Punamäki, R., & Pirttilä‐Backman, A. (2017) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/sode.12190 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, G.
- Venue
- Psychology, Health & Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-62
- ISSN
- 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2080166546
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 31.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The capacity of the extended family safety net for orphans in Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/135485000106007
- The paper
- Foster, G. (2000). The capacity of the extended family safety net for orphans in Africa. Psychology, Health & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/135485000106007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.