Cited by 41Cancer survivorship and careQualitative research in healthIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Exploring quality of life in Italian patients with rare disease: a computer-aided content analysis of illness stories

Caputo, Andrea·2014·Psychology, Health & Medicine

Abstract

The present study used a narrative-based approach to identify common themes that characterized the illness experience and quality of life of patients affected by rare disease (RD). Textual data were comprised of illness stories written by 32 adult Italian patients (eight men and 24 women), with the following RD diagnoses: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n = 12), anorectal atresia (n = 4), Poland syndrome (n = 4), and idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (n = 12). Computer-aided content analysis was performed to detect the main themes (cluster analysis) and latent factors (correspondence analysis) emerging in patients' narratives, and to test their association with gender and diagnosis. Four thematic domains were detected in the textual corpus, which are respectively referred to as: hopelessness (12.74%), need for autonomy (38.43%), search for normalcy (11.89%), and expectations of recovery (36.94%). Three latent factors explained the overall data variance: the relationship with social and medical healthcare providers (F1), adjustment processes to disease and social limitations (F2), and self-beliefs and coping (F3). Some differences were revealed with respect to patient gender and diagnosis. Illness stories highlight the significant relationship of RD patients with healthcare services and their need for a holistic approach because of the lack of effective treatment. Physical limitation and emotional distress do not necessarily seem to overlap for adjustment and quality of life (QoL). Overall, the perception of illness chronicity is likely to affect patients' self-beliefs and coping with more than their feeling of abnormalcy, that is the less salient theme.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13548506.2013.793372

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 41

Authors
Caputo, A.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Caputo, Andrea
Venue
Psychology, Health & Medicine
Published
2013-05-07
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
211-221
ISSN
  • 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3966
OpenAlex
W2060063586
Cited by
41
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative research in health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
rare diseases, quality of life, illness narratives, patient experience, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, anorectal atresia, Poland syndrome, idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, hopelessness, autonomy, coping, gender differences, chronic disease, Italian patients
MeSH terms
Anorectal Malformations, Adult, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Anus, Imperforate, Computers, Humans, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Italy, Poland Syndrome, Quality of Life, Cluster Analysis, Narration, Rare Diseases, Qualitative Research, Familial Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review