Cited by 33Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Doctor-patient relationship and quality of life in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: an exploratory study of the potential mediating role of illness perceptions and acceptance

Open access
Hulme, Katrin, Chilcot, Joseph, Smith, Michael A.·2018·Psychology, Health & Medicine

Abstract

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterised by unpredictable bowel symptoms. These can be difficult to manage, consequently impacting quality of life (QoL). In addition, a strained doctor-patient relationship is independently reported in the qualitative literature. Given the doctor is often the first port of call for people with IBS, a difficult relationship may influence subsequent IBS management. Research suggests illness perceptions are important in determining IBS outcomes in therapy; however, their association with doctor-patient relationship and QoL is yet to be investigated. This exploratory study aimed to investigate the association between these constructs in IBS, as well as potential mediation by illness perceptions. Online questionnaires measuring doctor-patient relationship, illness perceptions, acceptance and QoL, were completed by 167 participants who reported an IBS diagnosis (144 female, mean age = 44.22 years, SD = 15.91 years). Bootstrapped pathway analysis was used to model the relationship and mediation effects. There was a significant positive correlation between patient-doctor relationship and QoL, r = .258, n = 167, p = .001. There was a significant indirect effect between doctor-patient relationship and QoL through illness coherence and acceptance (bootstrapped estimate = .058, 95%CI Lower-Upper = .02, .095, p = .002). No other indirect effects were observed in combination with good fit indices for the other illness perceptions. Findings suggest a doctor-patient relationship which fosters mutual understanding and helps patients make sense of symptoms, increases their ability to manage their IBS in a psychologically flexible manner, subsequently helping them maintain their QoL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13548506.2017.1417613

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An empathic approach can improve quality of life and symptoms, reduce healthcare visits and enhance adherence to treatment.

    “An empathic approach can improve quality of life and symptoms, 110 reduce healthcare visits and enhance adherence to treatment.108 111”

    From British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that helping patients make sense of their IBS could improve quality of life, and the paper links a mutually understanding doctor–patient relationship with maintaining quality of life. It does not report that an empathic approach improves symptoms, reduces healthcare visits, or increases treatment adherence; its exploratory findings also do not establish that the approach causes improvement. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ferreira, N. B., Morris, P., Eugenicos, M. P., Gillanders, D. (2010). The role of illness perceptions and acceptance in outcomes of irritable bowel syndrome [Abstract]. Psychology & Health, 25(1), 33.
  2. Pearl, J. (2012). The causal foundation of structural equation modelling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modelling (pp.68-91). New York, USA: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hulme, K., Chilcot, J., & Smith, M. A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Hulme, Katrin
Venue
Psychology, Health & Medicine
Published
2017-12-20
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
674-684
ISSN
  • 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3966
OpenAlex
W2779652145
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, physician-patient relationship, quality of life, illness perception, acceptance of illness, illness coherence, mediation, functional gastrointestinal disorders, psychological flexibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review