Cited by 17Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Health and Mental HealthNursing care and research

Patients’ and carers’ perspective of the impact of heart failure on quality of life: a qualitative study

Open access
Nwosu, Winifred Onyinyechi, Rajani, Ronak, McDonaugh, Theresa, Driscoll, Elizabeth, Hughes, Lyndsay D.·2022·Psychology, Health & Medicine

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a syndrome associated with high mortality and morbidity. HF patients tend to be at a high risk of poor clinical and psychosocial outcomes. This study aimed to capture patients’ and carers perspectives of HF, the impact on their health reported QoL, and the factors associated with their poor health outcomes. To explore HF patients’ and carers’ views on their QoL since diagnosis. This study used a cross-sectional, qualitative design with semi-structured interviews conducted with participating patients and carers. Thirteen adults (> 18 years) with HF and 21 carers were interviewed over the telephone, following a semi-structured interview schedule. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Three main themes were identified, with an overarching theme . Themes included impact on patients’ lifestyle including diet, smoking and inability to part-take in social activities, adjusting to HF diagnosis and co-morbidity management, and psychological/mental health issues such as anxiety and depression. Patients with HF are at high-risk of various issues which can negatively impact their QoL. Additionally, Carers play a vital role in the management of HF patients. Effective patient centred care and better communication between patients, carers and healthcare professionals is vital in HF management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13548506.2021.1922719

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nwosu, W. O., Rajani, R., McDonaugh, T., Driscoll, E., & Hughes, L. D.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Nwosu, Winifred Onyinyechi
Venue
Psychology, Health & Medicine
Published
2021-05-05
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1381-1396
ISSN
  • 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3966
OpenAlex
W3157111788
Cited by
17
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
heart failure, quality of life, patient perspectives, caregiver perspectives, lifestyle impact, diet, smoking, social participation (health and rehabilitation), adjustment to diagnosis, comorbidity management, anxiety, depression, mental health, patient-centered care
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review