The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attitudes towards Recycling Household Waste in Exeter, Devon: Quantitative and qualitative approaches
Abstract
Recycling of household waste has become a very problematic area of British local government policy-making in which central government has set ambitious targets. Although local government can provide facilities for recycling, the attitudes of residents will be crucial if these targets are to be met. Accordingly, this paper outlines a framework for studying how households decide to recycle or not. The framework has been tested in Exeter in south-west England where a major survey found that respondents were much more likely to recycle if they had access to a structured kerbside recycling scheme. Many other factors influenced their attitudes and behaviours towards recycling, including their acceptance of the activity and their perception of the benefits and problems of recycling as a whole. The research uses the quantitative and qualitative data from the survey to demonstrate how individual attitudes can impact on recycling and how such research can yield useful data to enable policy-makers to adapt measures accordingly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 · Cited by 3,390
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Research Policy and Review 6. Future Directions for Environmental Policy
O'Riordan, T. (1985) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a171431 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Botetzagias, I., Dima, A.-F., & Malesios, C. (2015) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004 · Cited by 616
A hierarchical analysis of the green consciousness of the Egyptian consumer
Mostafa, M. M. (2007) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20168 · Cited by 567
Factors influencing the rate of recycling: An analysis of Minnesota counties
Sidique, S. F., Joshi, S. V., & Lupi, F. (2010) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.006 · Cited by 314
Miliute-Plepiene, J., Hage, O., Plepys, A., & Reipas, A. (2016) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.05.008 · Cited by 160
Willingness of residents to participate in e-waste recycling in India
Dwivedy, M., & Mittal, R. K. (2013) · Environmental Development · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2013.03.001 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Barr, S., Ford, N. J., & Gilg, A. W.
- Venue
- Local Environment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407-421
- ISSN
- 1354-9839 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-6711
- OpenAlex
- W2071298255
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitudes towards Recycling Household Waste in Exeter, Devon: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13549830306667
- The paper
- Barr, S., Ford, N. J., & Gilg, A. W. (2003). Attitudes towards Recycling Household Waste in Exeter, Devon: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Local Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830306667
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.