The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Thinking Habits into Action: the role of knowledge and process in questioning household consumption practices
Abstract
Despite occupying a central place in the sustainable development paradigm, calls for individuals in high-income countries to adopt patterns of sustainable consumption have failed to gain ground in the past decade. The low uptake of public messages that emphasise links between the environment and the home are caused by a plethora of 'barriers to action', which range from individual circumstances to public norms and structures. This article argues that in addition to these barriers, consideration of how individuals read and react to sustainable consumption information is important. Based on interviews with participants of a sustainable behaviour change programme called Action at Home, this article considers both how, and in what form, knowledge is mobilised when individuals rethink their personal practices. Using Giddens' structuration theory, a framework is presented. This framework emphasises the importance of 'known' or 'local' information, as well as discursive processes, in addressing individual consumption practices and argues that a 'cultural politics' of sustainable consumption needs to be factored into on-going academic and policy debates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Gifford, R. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023566 · Cited by 2,326
Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004 · Cited by 2,026
What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts
Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002 · Cited by 1,073
Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change
Hargreaves, T. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540510390500 · Cited by 1,060
Consuming Ethics: Articulating the Subjects and Spaces of Ethical Consumption
Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N., & Malpass, A. (2005) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00472.x · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Hobson, K.
- Venue
- Local Environment
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-112
- ISSN
- 1354-9839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996251376
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thinking Habits into Action: the role of knowledge and process in questioning household consumption practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13549830306673
- The paper
- Hobson, K. (2003). Thinking Habits into Action: the role of knowledge and process in questioning household consumption practices. Local Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830306673
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.