Cited by 58Gender, Education, and Development IssuesGender Studies and Social IssuesWater Resource Management and Quality

Mainstreaming gender in the WASH sector: Dilution or distillation?

Open access
Fisher, Julie, Cavill, Sue, Reed, Brian·2017·Gender & Development

Abstract

The way women’s issues have been conceptualised and acted on in the context of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) has changed over the past four decades. The discourses and trends in development studies – from the Women in Development approach of the 1970s to Gender and Development in the 1980s – were mirrored in the WASH sector. The WASH sector has contributed to, and been shaped by, debates on women’s needs and, latterly, on gender perspectives based on a combined argument for equity and efficiency. In addition, in the last decade, the WASH sector has developed its own distinctive initiatives, such as menstrual hygiene management and, recently, specific WASH considerations relating to gender-based violence. This paper assesses whether the result of this sector-specific response has been a dilution or distillation of gender issues. It concludes that the WASH sector has not disregarded the goals of women’s empowerment and gender equality; rather, it has contributed to understandings of how resources – such as infrastructure and services – underpin that empowerment. This allows an important recognition of the value and impact of WASH-sector priorities and actions for the wider well-being of women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13552074.2017.1331541

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 82% (211) of included articles were published since 2010, providing evidence that aligns with previous anecdotal observations that empowerment is increasingly a focus in water and sanitation research.

    “We found that 82% (211) of included articles were published since 2010, providing evidence that aligns with previous anecdotal observations that empowerment is increasingly a focus in water and sanitation research [28,39].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 58

Authors
Fisher, J., Cavill, S., & Reed, B.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Julie
Venue
Gender & Development
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
185-204
ISSN
  • 1355-2074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-9221
OpenAlex
W2719635423
Cited by
58
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Gender & Development (publishedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
Keywords
gender mainstreaming, water, sanitation and hygiene, women's empowerment, gender equality, women in development, gender and development, menstrual hygiene management, gender-based violence, equity and efficiency, women's needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review