The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Sociology of Bourdieu and the Construction of the ‘Object’ in Translation and Interpreting Studies
Abstract
This article introduces Bourdieu’s sociological perspective and its relevance to translation and interpreting studies. It discusses Bourdieu’s key concepts – habitus, field, capital and illusio – and their contribution to theorizations of the interaction between structure and agency in sociological and philosophical debates. Considerable attention is paid to the relationship between Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and the emergent interest in the ethnographic tradition within translation and interpreting studies, particularly the influence of the interpretive approach of Geertz and the subsequent work of Clifford and Marcus within the culturalist paradigm. The question of methodology is addressed in relation to Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and the construction of the ‘object’ of sociological research. The article further explore show Bourdieu’s concepts may be made to work empirically within translation and interpreting research and how much this depend son embracing Bourdieu’s ontological and epistemological stance. Bourdieu’s work is briefly explored in relation to other sociological theories that have begun to emerge as relevant to translation studies, in particular the work of Latour and Luhmann, and additional future directions for research within the sociology of translation and interpreting are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812507 · Cited by 27,606
The Interpretation of Cultures
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,449
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology.
Camic, C., Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074573 · Cited by 9,324
(1986) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520946286 · Cited by 5,607
Clifford, J. (1986) · Writing Culture · doi:10.1525/9780520946286-003 · Cited by 2,144
Ethnography through Thick and Thin
Marcus, G. E. (1999) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400851805 · Cited by 2,094
Clifford, J. (1983) · Representations · doi:10.2307/2928386 · Cited by 929
Post-Modern Ethnography: From Document of the Occult to Occult Document
Tyler, S. A. (1986) · Writing Culture · doi:10.1525/9780520946286-008 · Cited by 687
Metadata
- Authors
- Inghilleri, M.
- Venue
- The Translator
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-145
- ISSN
- 1355-6509 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-0409
- OpenAlex
- W1976698646
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 26.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Sociology of Bourdieu and the Construction of the ‘Object’ in Translation and Interpreting Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13556509.2005.10799195
- The paper
- Inghilleri, M. (2005). The Sociology of Bourdieu and the Construction of the ‘Object’ in Translation and Interpreting Studies. The Translator. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2005.10799195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.