Cited by 5Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInnovations in Medical EducationInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Sustainable interprofessional education programmes: What influences teachers to stay involved?

Beckingsale, Louise, Brown, Melanie, McKinlay, Eileen, OLeary, Marissa, Doolan-Noble, Fiona·2023·Journal of Interprofessional Care

Abstract

Delivery of interprofessional education (IPE) initiatives for pre-licensure students is increasingly the norm in health and social care training programmes. This collaborative form of education relies on teachers from various disciplines joining together to facilitate IPE. When IPE programmes first start, goodwill often prevails and facilitators are keen to take part. But as time goes on, retaining the IPE facilitator workforce is challenging. Research was undertaken to explore the experience of IPE facilitators who were part of a New Zealand university-based ten year old IPE programme. The research used a qualitative survey approach. Responses were received from 29% of all those invited to participate. Closed questions were collated and free-text survey responses analyzed using Template Analysis. Three themes and one integrative theme were identified. Themes include facilitators who are recognized, facilitators who are confident, and facilitators who are inspired. Themes were mediated by macro, meso and micro level forces. The cross-cutting integrative theme showed IPE facilitators experienced individual tipping points, with the potential to influence their continued involvement. These tipping points need to be recognized and addressed by those in senior level positions (macro-governance and meso-management), to ensure IPE facilitators continue and IPE programmes remain sustainable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13561820.2022.2115470

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Beckingsale, L., Brown, M., McKinlay, E., OLeary, M., & Doolan-Noble, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • General Practice and Rural Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Corresponding author
Beckingsale, Louise
Venue
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Published
2022-10-20
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
637-646
ISSN
  • 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9567
OpenAlex
W4306878294
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Interprofessional Education Centre, University of Otago Aotearoa New Zealand
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
interprofessional education, teacher retention, tipping points, micro, meso and macro levels, interprofessional collaboration
MeSH terms
Interprofessional Education, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Health Occupations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review