Cited by 1,923Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research

Open access
Brooks, Joanna, McCluskey, Serena, Turley, Emma, King, Nigel·2015·Qualitative Research in Psychology

Abstract

Thematic analysis is widely used in qualitative psychology research, and in this article, we present a particular style of thematic analysis known as Template Analysis. We outline the technique and consider its epistemological position, then describe three case studies of research projects which employed Template Analysis to illustrate the diverse ways it can be used. Our first case study illustrates how the technique was employed in data analysis undertaken by a team of researchers in a large-scale qualitative research project. Our second example demonstrates how a qualitative study that set out to build on mainstream theory made use of the a priori themes (themes determined in advance of coding) permitted in Template Analysis. Our final case study shows how Template Analysis can be used from an interpretative phenomenological stance. We highlight the distinctive features of this style of thematic analysis, discuss the kind of research where it may be particularly appropriate, and consider possible limitations of the technique. We conclude that Template Analysis is a flexible form of thematic analysis with real utility in qualitative psychology research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14780887.2014.955224

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Template analysis maintains rigour by ensuring critical reflexivity throughout all six phases, iterative coding from stage three onwards, and accuracy checking in the final two stages.

    “Template analysis maintains rigour by ensuring critical reflexivity is engaged with throughout all six phases; as well as iterative coding is practiced from stage three onwards; and ensuring accuracy checking in the final two stages ([28]; see Fig. 3).”
  • Template analysis follows a six-stage process and is a highly methodical approach to analysis.

    “Template analysis follows a six-stage process: 1) Re-familiarization with the Data; 2) Preliminary Coding; 3) Organization of Themes in the Template; 4) Defining the Template; 5) Application of the Final Template to the Full Dataset; and 6) Finalization of Template Definitions; thus making template analysis a highly methodical approach to analysis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
Brooks, Joanna
Venue
Qualitative Research in Psychology
Published
2015-02-23
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
202-222
ISSN
  • 1478-0887 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-0895
OpenAlex
W1513859721
Cited by
1,923
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 259 · 2025: 328 · 2024: 315 · 2023: 258 · 2022: 245 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
212.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Qualitative Research in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Macmillan Cancer Support
  • Bupa Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
template analysis, thematic analysis, epistemology of qualitative research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review