Cited by 31Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInnovations in Medical EducationInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The status and outcomes of interprofessional health education in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review

Open access

Abstract

The increasing burden of chronic diseases, and shortage of health care workers especially in Low and Middle Income countries (LMICs) requires greater collaborative working between health professions. There is a growing body of evidence that interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional continuous education (IPCE) can improve collaborative practice thus strengthening health care delivery in low resource settings. The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes this educational strategy in these regions as part of wider programs to improve health care. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize IPE and IPCE activities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and its outcomes; including practice, service and patient outcomes. Standard guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic reviews were followed. The online databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC), the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Science Direct. The Kirkpatrick model was used to classify IPE outcomes reported from literature. Following full text screening, 41 articles were selected for data extraction. It was found that IPE/IPCE is still a relatively new concept in SSA with 93% of studies published after 2012. Furthermore, IPE is concentrated predominantly in undergraduate institutions and mainly implemented to improve collaborative practice and address important public health concerns. Positive reaction and outcomes of IPE/IPCE were reported in terms of change of attitude and perception toward collaborative practice as well as knowledge and skills acquisition. Few studies in SSA sought to understand and measure the outcomes of IPE/IPCE relating to health care practice. More work in this important potential outcome of IPE/IPCE is recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13561820.2023.2168631

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001115 · DOI
  2. 10.4103/1596-3519.91006 · DOI
  3. 10.4103/1596-3519.188896 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1049909114527153 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/9781118558775.ch6 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/978-94-6209-353-9 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30370-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/13561820.2019.1605981 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/13561820.2019.1605236 · DOI
  10. 10.1186/s12909-020-02429-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.012 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/1524839910384077 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/s12909-020-02264-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/sih.0000000000000531 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cptl.2014.11.017 · DOI
  16. Dornan, T., Mann, K. V., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., & Spencer, J. A. (2011). Medical education: Theory and practice E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences. https://books.google.rw/books?id=qUHFAAAAQBAJ
  17. 10.1080/13561820.2017.1329717 · DOI
  18. 10.1186/s12909-017-0957-5 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/s12884-017-1478-2 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/13561820.2016.1218830 · DOI
  21. 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.556 · DOI
  22. 10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.1.46179 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/s12960-020-00552-1 · DOI
  24. 10.4103/1357-6283.134362 · DOI
  25. 10.3109/13561820.2015.1017555 · DOI
  26. Gilbert, J. H. V. (2010). The status of interprofessional education in Canada. Journal of Allied Health, 39(SUPPL. 1), 216–223.
  27. Gilbert, J. H. V., Yan, J., & Hoffman, S. J. (2010). A WHO report: Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Journal of Allied Health, 39(SUPPL. 1), 196–197.
  28. 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30374-2 · DOI
  29. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000232 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/01421590701682576 · DOI
  31. 10.7196/ajhpe.2016.v8i2.845 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/13561820.2017.1310718 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/s12909-020-02420-x · DOI
  34. Kirkpatrick, D. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of American Society of Training Directors, 13(11), 3–9.
  35. Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Great ideas revisited. Training & Development, 50(1), 54.
  36. 10.1177/1757975914528728 · DOI
  37. 10.3109/13561829809014119 · DOI
  38. 10.1057/jphp.2012.49 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.06.013 · DOI
  40. 10.3109/13561820.2014.991912 · DOI
  41. Martini, N., & Caceres, R. (2012). Triune case study: An exploration into inter-professional education (IPE) in an online environment supporting global health. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 20(3), 68–86.
  42. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.22608/APO.2018148 · DOI
  44. 10.3233/WOR-2012-1297 · DOI
  45. 10.22605/rrh2671 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/13561820.2019.1612332 · DOI
  47. 10.1186/1475-2875-11-44 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/13561820.2020.1782356 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/14703297.2014.993417 · DOI
  50. 10.5430/IJHE.V9N3P262 · DOI
  51. Rayyan. (2021). Rayyan – Intelligent Systematic Review . https://www.rayyan.ai/
  52. 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663 · DOI
  53. 10.3109/13561820.2010.529960 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/9781444325027 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/13561820.2019.1572600 · DOI
  57. 10.1186/s12909-021-02537-7 · DOI
  58. 10.1371/journal.pone.0226247 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/13561820.2019.1596890 · DOI
  60. 10.1080/13561820.2019.1611288 · DOI
  61. 10.7196/ajhpe.2020.v12i2.1213 · DOI
  62. 10.1080/13561820.2018.1538106 · DOI
  63. 10.3109/13561820.2014.891572 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.022 · DOI
  65. 10.1080/13561820.2017.1408576 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.infpip.2019.100012 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Kitema, G. F., Laidlaw, A., O’Carroll, V., Sagahutu, J. B., & Blaikie, A.
Affiliations
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Rwanda (RW)
Corresponding author
Kitema, Gatera Fiston
Venue
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Published
2023-02-05
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
133-155
ISSN
  • 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9567
OpenAlex
W4319262334
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Global Challenges Research Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
interprofessional education, sub-Saharan Africa, collaborative practice, health professions education, Kirkpatrick model, chronic disease burden, low- and middle-income countries, attitudes toward collaboration, knowledge and skills acquisition
MeSH terms
Interprofessional Education, Health Education, Health Personnel, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Africa South of the Sahara

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review