Cited by 185Global Health Workforce IssuesHealthcare Policy and ManagementInterprofessional Education and Collaboration

Barriers to healthcare as reported by rural and urban interprofessional providers

Brems, Christiane, Johnson, Mark E., Warner, Teddy D., Roberts, Laura Weiss·2006·Journal of Interprofessional Care

Abstract

The research literature is replete with reports of barriers to care perceived by rural patients seeking healthcare. Less often reported are barriers perceived by the rural healthcare providers themselves. The current study is an extensive survey of over 1,500 healthcare providers randomly selected from two US states with large rural populations, Alaska and New Mexico. Barriers consistently identified across rural and urban regions by all healthcare professionals were Patient Complexity, Resource Limitations, Service Access, Training Constraints, and Patient Avoidance of Care. Findings confirmed that rural areas, however, struggle more with healthcare barriers than urban and small urban areas, especially as related to Resource Limitations, Confidentiality Limitations, Overlapping Roles, Provider Travel, Service Access, and Training Constraints. Almost consistently, the smaller a provider's practice community, the greater the reports of barriers, with the most severe barriers reported in small rural communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13561820600622208

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brems, C., Johnson, M. E., Warner, T. D., & Roberts, L. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Alaska Anchorage (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Brems, Christiane
Venue
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Published
2006-01
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
105-118
ISSN
  • 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9567
OpenAlex
W2046872174
Cited by
184
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Keywords
barriers to care, rural health care providers, urban-rural differences, resource constraints, access to services, patient complexity, training constraints, small rural communities, Alaska, New Mexico
MeSH terms
Alaska, Female, Health Personnel, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Mexico, Rural Health Services, Urban Health Services, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review