The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer observation as a transformatory tool?1
Abstract
This article is an account of my search for professional identity as a new university lecturer through the use of the peer observation of teaching (POT) techniques. Through a synthesis of selected theoretical literature, associated critical reflection, and my own experiences of professional development through POT, the paper presents a conceptual framework for POT that accommodates both technical development, critical know-how in the classroom, and personal growth and change. The paper argues that an instrumental interpretation of POT is not sufficient to enhance teacher performance in the classroom. Rather, learning about teaching, and heightening a sense of professionalism stems from a continuous process of transforming personal meaning. This demands an active engagement with pedagogical theory, purposeful critical reflection on classroom practice, and a challenging of assumptions through shared critical reflection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Action Research and Minority Problems
Lewin, K. (1946) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x · Cited by 6,554
Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing
Mason, J. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203471876 · Cited by 885
Cited by
Amundsen, C., & Wilson, M. (2012) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312438409 · Cited by 317
16: Teaching and Learning Together
Cook–Sather, A. (2011) · To Improve the Academy · doi:10.3998/tia.17063888.0029.020 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Peel, D.
- Venue
- Teaching in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 489-504
- ISSN
- 1356-2517 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1294
- OpenAlex
- W2066988937
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peer observation as a transformatory tool?1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13562510500239125
- The paper
- Peel, D. (2005). Peer observation as a transformatory tool?1. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500239125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.