Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

16: Teaching and Learning Together

Open access
Cook–Sather, Alison·2011·To Improve the Academy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3998/tia.17063888.0029.020

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cook-Sather, A. (2006b). Sound, presence, and power: Exploring "student voice" in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359-390.
  2. Cowan,]., & Westwood,]. (2006). Collaborative and reflective professional development: A pilot. Active Learning in Higher Education: The journal of the Institute for Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 63-71.
  3. Cox, M. D. (2000). Student-faculty partnerships to develop teaching and enhance learning. In]. E. Miller,]. E. Groccia, & M. S. Miller (Eds.), Student-assisted teaching: A guide to faculty-student teamwork (pp. 168-171). San Francisco: ]ossey-Bass/Anker.
  4. Cox, M. D., & Sorenson, D. L. (2000). Student collaboration in faculty development. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), To improve the academy: Vol. 18. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 97-106). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  5. Lesnick, A., & Cook-Sather, A. (2010). Building civic capacity and responsibility through a radically inclusive teaching and learning initiative. Innovative Higher Education, 35(1), 3-17.
  6. Mihans, R., Long, D., & Felten, P. (2008). Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2). Retrieved from http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotUv2n2.html
  7. Shulman, L. S. (2004). Teaching as community property: Putting an end to pedagogical solitude. In L. S. Shulman, Teaching as community property: Essays on higher education (pp. 140-144). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  8. Sorenson, L. (2001). College teachers and student consultants: Collaborating about teaching and learning. In J. E. Miller, J. E. Groccia, & M. S. Miller (Eds.), Student-assisted teaching: A guide to faculty-student teamwork (pp. 179-183). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Anker.

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Cook–Sather, A.
Venue
To Improve the Academy
Published
2011-01-01
Volume
29
Issue
20210331
ISSN
  • 1065-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-4822
OpenAlex
W4245537478
Cited by
2
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • To improve the academy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Michigan Library Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
teaching-learning process, cooperative learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 16: Teaching and Learning Together. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3998/tia.17063888.0029.020
The paper
Cook–Sather, A. (2011). 16: Teaching and Learning Together. To Improve the Academy. https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.17063888.0029.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.