The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can teacher collaboration overcome barriers to interdisciplinary learning in a disciplinary university? A case study using climate change
Open accessAbstract
A teacher network was formed at an Australian university in order to better promote interdisciplinary student learning on the complex social-environmental problem of climate change. Rather than leaving it to students to piece together disciplinary responses, eight teaching academics collaborated on the task of exposing students to different types of knowledge in a way that was more than the summing of disciplinary parts. With a part-time network facilitator providing cohesion, network members were able to teach into each other's classes, and share material and student activities across a range of units that included business, zoology, marine science, geography and education. Participants reported that the most positive aspects of the project were the collegiality and support for teaching innovation provided by peers. However, participants also reported being time-poor and overworked. Maintaining the collaboration beyond the initial one year project proved difficult because without funding for the network facilitator, participants were unable to dedicate the time required to meet and collaborate on shared activities. In order to strengthen teacher collaboration in a university whose administrative structures are predominantly discipline-based, there is need for recognition of the benefits of interdisciplinary learning to be matched by recognition of the need for financial and other resources to support collaborative teaching initiatives.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Universities and disciplines still tend to act in their own domains even when the explicit goal is crossing disciplinary boundaries (Pharo et al., 2012).”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Pharo et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.1080/13562517.2010.507310 · DOI
- Barab S.A, 1997, Educational Leadership, 54, 52
- 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[1127:HTATWW]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/jhe.2007.0008 · DOI
- 10.1002/casp.777 · DOI
- Brown V.A., 2010, Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination, 16
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.010 · DOI
- 10.1080/07294360.2011.536970 · DOI
- Chettiparamb A., 2007, Interdisciplinary teaching and learning group, 63
- Cox M.D., 2001, To Improve the Academy, 19, 63
- 10.1108/14676370510623847 · DOI
- Davies , M ., and M. Devlin . 2007 . Interdisciplinary higher education and the Melbourne Model. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia , 6–9 December , in Wellington , New Zealand , 1 – 16 . http://www.deakin.edu.au/dro/eserv/DU:30006786/devlin-interdisciplinaryhigher-2007.pdf (accessed March 7, 2011) .
- 10.1080/10304310701861598 · DOI
- 10.1002/tl.7604 · DOI
- 10.5328/JVER28.1.85 · DOI
- 10.1080/13583883.1999.9966992 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075070701267228 · DOI
- 10.1080/03098260601033050 · DOI
- Gray B., 2004, Journal of Distance Education, 19, 20
- Hulme M., 2009, Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity, 10.1017/CBO9780511841200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002716204268185 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00047-1 · DOI
- 10.1080/13583880601151254 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11162-004-6227-5 · DOI
- Klein J.T., 1990, Library Trends, 45, 134
- Lattuca L.R, 2001, Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty, 10.2307/j.ctv167563f · DOI
- Lawrence R.J., 2010, Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination, 16
- 10.1177/0022487100051003010 · DOI
- 10.1080/0307507032000058082 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562517.2011.530756 · DOI
- 10.1080/713692738 · DOI
- Petrie H.G., 1992, Review of Research in Education, 18, 299
- 10.1080/03098260802276748 · DOI
- Redding J.C., 2009, National Association of Secondary Schools Principals Bulletin, 83, 28
- Schmitz C.L, 2010, Critical Social Work, 11, 3
- Schön D.A., 1983, The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
- Senge P.M., 2000, Leading academic change: Essential roles for department chairs, 277
- 10.1023/A:1022355226924 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10648-009-9113-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00049180500512010 · DOI
- 10.1080/07294360600947285 · DOI
- Wenger E., 2005, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity
- 10.1007/s10734-006-9027-3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kinnula, M., Iivari, N., Kuure, L., & Molin-Juustila, T. (2023) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09473-8 · Cited by 6
“Universities and disciplines still tend to act in their own domains even when the explicit goal is crossing disciplinary boundaries (Pharo et al., 2012).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Pharo, E. J., Davison, A., Warr, K., Nursey-Bray, M., Beswick, K., Wapstra, E., & Jones, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Pharo, E.J.
- Venue
- Teaching in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 497-507
- ISSN
- 1356-2517 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1294
- OpenAlex
- W2076888949
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Teaching in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Education › Sustainability in Higher Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- teacher collaboration, interdisciplinary learning, climate change education, teacher networks, collaborative teaching, barriers to collaboration, university teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review