The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teaching Empathy to First Year Medical Students: Evaluation of an Elective Literature and Medicine Course
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Empathy is critical to the development of professionalism in medical students, and the humanities-particularly literature-have been touted as an effective tool for increasing student empathy. This quantitative/qualitative study was undertaken to assess whether reading and discussing poetry and prose related to patients and doctors could significantly increase medical student empathy and appreciation of the relevance of the humanities for their own professional development. METHOD: In 2000-2001, first year students (n=22) volunteered for an eight-session literature and medicine elective and were randomly assigned to either immediate participation in the class or a wait-list group, who participated in the same class 6 months later. Complete pre- and post-intervention data for 16 students from both groups were obtained for two quantitative measures of empathy and an attitudes-toward-the-humanities scale. Students also participated in a qualitative group interview pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Empathy and attitudes toward the humanities improved significantly (p<0.01) after participation in the class when both groups of students were combined. The scaled treatment effect size was in the moderate range (> or =0.60 standard deviation units) for both measures that had statistically significant pre-to-post changes. Furthermore, student understanding of the patient's perspective became more detailed and complex after the intervention. Students were also more likely post-intervention to note ways reading literature could help them cope with training-related stress. CONCLUSION: A brief literature-based course can contribute to greater student empathy and appreciation for the value of humanities in medical education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Educating for empathy: A review
Stepien, K. A., & Baernstein, A. (2006) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00443.x · Cited by 555
Interventions to cultivate physician empathy: a systematic review
Kelm, Z., Womer, J., Walter, J. K., & Feudtner, C. (2014) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-219 · Cited by 395
Shanafelt, T. D., West, C., Zhao, X., Novotny, P., Kolars, J., Habermann, T., & Sloan, J. (2005) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-005-0102-8 · Cited by 355
Empathy among Medical Students: Is There a Relation with Quality of Life and Burnout?
Paro, H. B. M. S., Silveira, P. S. P., Perotta, B., Gannam, S., Enns, S. C., Giaxa, R. R. B., Bonito, R. F., Martins, M. A., & Tempski, P. Z. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094133 · Cited by 287
Austin, E. J., Evans, P., Goldwater, R., & Potter, V. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.014 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, J., Morrison, E., & Boker, J.
- Venue
- Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-84
- ISSN
- 1357-6283 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5804
- OpenAlex
- W2128885791
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teaching Empathy to First Year Medical Students: Evaluation of an Elective Literature and Medicine Course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13576280310001656196
- The paper
- Shapiro, J., Morrison, E., & Boker, J. (2004). Teaching Empathy to First Year Medical Students: Evaluation of an Elective Literature and Medicine Course. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576280310001656196
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.