The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Students, Stress and Coping Strategies: A Case of Pakistani Medical School
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Assess the perception of stress amongst medical students and their coping strategies. METHODOLOGY/STUDY DESIGN: A cross sectional study using a semi-structured self administered questionnaire was carried out over four weeks, using a small sample of students of all categories and classes of a medical college. RESULTS: A total of 264 students out of 300 (88%) filled in the questionnaire. Inability to cope, helplessness, increased psychological pressure, mental tension and too much workload are 'stress factors' for students. A considerable majority (> 90%) think that they have been stressed at one time or another. Ninety-four per cent of males have experienced stress. The senior students of the fourth and final year feel more stressed (95% and 98% respectively). Low moods, inability to concentrate, loss of temper are most common symptoms. Females report more symptoms. Academics and exams are the most powerful stressors. Sports, music, hanging out with friends, sleeping or going into isolation are various coping mechanisms. Stress can affect the academic performance. If needed, students prefer to talk to a peer. They demand more recreational activities on campus, revised schedule of academics and exams, better counselling facilities and improvement in student-teacher relationship. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of perceived stress seems to be high among medical students, which tends to affect not only their academic performances but also all aspects of health. Review of academics and exam schedules, more leisure time activities, better interaction with the faculty and proper guidance, advisory services and peer counselling at the campus could do a lot to reduce the stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 Educational Outcomes
Medina, M. S., Plaza, C. M., Stowe, C. D., Robinson, E. T., DeLander, G., Beck, D. E., Melchert, R. B., Supernaw, R. B., Roche, V. F., Gleason, B. L., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe778162 · Cited by 951
Prevalence of psychological stress, depression and anxiety among medical students in Egypt
Fawzy, M., & Hamed, S. A. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.027 · Cited by 455
Stress amongst dental students: a systematic review
Alzahem, A. M., van der Molen, H. T., Alaujan, A. H., Schmidt, H. G., & Zamakhshary, M. H. (2011) · European Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00640.x · Cited by 437
Stress, burnout and coping strategies in preclinical medical students
Fares, J., Al Tabosh, H., Saadeddin, Z., El Mouhayyar, C., & Aridi, H. (2016) · North American Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.4103/1947-2714.177299 · Cited by 381
Lemma, S., Gelaye, B., Berhane, Y., Worku, A., & Williams, M. A. (2012) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-12-237 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaikh, B., Kahloon, A., Kazmi, M., Khalid, H., Nawaz, K., Khan, N., & Khan, S.
- Venue
- Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-353
- ISSN
- 1357-6283 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5804
- OpenAlex
- W2078926442
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Students, Stress and Coping Strategies: A Case of Pakistani Medical School. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13576280400002585
- The paper
- Shaikh, B., Kahloon, A., Kazmi, M., Khalid, H., Nawaz, K., Khan, N., & Khan, S. (2004). Students, Stress and Coping Strategies: A Case of Pakistani Medical School. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576280400002585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.