Cited by 34Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Education and AssessmentsGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

It’s all just a little bit of history repeating: 40 years of political review and reform in teacher education

Open access
Alexander, Colette, Bourke, Terri·2021·Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education

Abstract

There have been at least 100 governmental inquiries into teacher education in Australia since the 1970s, making thousands of recommendations, the majority of which have never been fully actioned or realised. Additionally, there is minimal evidence about the efficacy of this continuous review cycle. Here, we problematise these issues by conducting a comparative analysis of the Bassett report, Review of Teacher Education in Queensland, the first review of independent teacher education in Australia conducted in 1978, and the most recent review by the Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group, Action Now: Classroom Ready Teachers. Applying discourse analysis techniques associated with Foucauldian archaeology, findings reveal: a self-referential use of policy is accelerating; those involved are less likely to have knowledge of the discipline of education; similarities in the discourses despite the 40-year timeframe; and increased marginalisation of teacher educators. In the light of these findings, the authors highlight the need for teacher educators to be politically savvy about the mythologising and canonising of allowable problems in teacher education. Teacher educators need to challenge policy and enter the public sphere in doing so.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359866x.2021.1895968

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 'accountability agenda' visible in ITE reforms in England is also visible in Australia and the United States.

    “For example, the 'accountability agenda' visible in ITE reforms in England (Ellis et al., 2019;Mutton et al., 2021;Towers et al., 2023) are also visible in Australia (Alexander & Bourke, 2021) and the United States (Fuller & Stevenson, 2019).”
  • A key aim of these reforms has been to increase regulatory control over the ITE sector through centralised curricular and a focus on 'accountability' and 'professional standards'.

    “A key aim of these reforms has been to increase regulatory control over the ITE sector through centralised curricular and a focus on 'accountability' and 'professional standards' (Alexander & Bourke, 2021;Churchward & Willis, 2019;Mutton et al., 2017) which are consistent with policy reforms beyond England.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, C., & Bourke, T.
Affiliations
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Alexander, Colette
Venue
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Published
2021-03-09
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
471-486
ISSN
  • 1359-866X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2945
OpenAlex
W3131713955
Cited by
32
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
teacher education policy, policy review, policy reform, Foucauldian archaeology, policy discourse, teacher educators, policy implementation, Australian teacher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review