The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Being part of the peer group: a literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education
Open accessAbstract
Maximizing the interaction between pupils with and without special needs is generally considered an important aspect of inclusion. However, it is frequently questioned whether pupils with special educational needs (SEN) in regular classrooms have interactions and friendships with their peers. In order to be able to evaluate these relationships, it is necessary to clarify concepts such as social participation, social integration and social inclusion. At the moment there is much ambiguity regarding these concepts. This article aims to elucidate on these concepts and reveal its characteristic themes. An analysis of literature was carried out to identify these concepts. In the final analysis, 62 articles were included. This analysis showed that the concept social integration and the related concepts of social inclusion and social participation are often described inaccurately, with only a few researchers providing explicit definitions or descriptions. In the majority of articles, implicit descriptions can be derived from instruments used to measure social integration, social inclusion or social participation: it is apparent there is much overlap among the use of concepts by researchers. Based on the analysis of the 62 articles, it can be concluded that the concepts social integration, social inclusion and social participation are used as synonyms. In our opinion, social participation is the most suitable concept. The analysis of literature reveals four key themes central to all three concepts: friendships/relationships, interactions/contacts, perception of the pupil with SEN and acceptance by classmates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Media Use and Social Connectedness in Adolescents: The Positives and the Potential Pitfalls
Allen, K. A., Ryan, T., Gray, D. L., McInerney, D. M., & Waters, L. (2014) · The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist · doi:10.1017/edp.2014.2 · Cited by 420
Inclusion: Conceptualization and measurement
Jansen, W. S., Otten, S., van der Zee, K. I., & Jans, L. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2011 · Cited by 314
(2013) · Cited by 133
The voice of inclusion in the midst of neoliberalist noise in the Bologna Process
Kushnir, I. (2020) · European Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1177/1474904120941694 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Koster, M., Nakken, H., Pijl, S. J., & van Houten, E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Inclusive Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-140
- ISSN
- 1360-3116 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5173
- OpenAlex
- W1984324629
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Being part of the peer group: a literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13603110701284680
- The paper
- Koster, M., Nakken, H., Pijl, S. J., & van Houten, E. (2009). Being part of the peer group: a literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701284680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.