Cited by 78Disability Rights and RepresentationLegal Issues in EducationInclusive Education and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How inclusive is the right to inclusive education? An assessment of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities’ concluding observations

Open access
Byrne, Bronagh·2022·International Journal of Inclusive Education

Abstract

Across jurisdictions, what constitutes inclusive education varies. The adoption of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in 2006 provides a critical opportunity to untangle the elasticity of ‘inclusive education’. Using Article 24 CRPD as the normative framework for inclusive education and drawing on a content and critical policy analysis of the Concluding Observations of all countries examined by the CRPD Committee to date, this article systematically explores the emerging trends and foci of the right to inclusive education across the globe and examines their implications for discourse and practice. It will be argued that while the right to inclusive education has become more focused, persistent concerns abound. In particular, voice must be given to children with the most complex and profound disabilities and for whom the practicalities of inclusive education are more difficult to achieve. Greater focus is also required in achieving a rights-compliant transition from segregated to inclusive education settings that does not, in the process of doing so, rescind the rights of the minority of children with the most profound disabilities currently in segregated schools. These issues need to be explicitly confronted so that the inclusive education can be promoted for all children with disabilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13603116.2019.1651411

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bourdieu Pierre., 2000, Pascalian Mediations
  2. United Nations, Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2016, General Comment 4: The Right to Inclusive Education

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Byrne, B.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Byrne, Bronagh
Venue
International Journal of Inclusive Education
Published
2019-08-06
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
301-318
ISSN
  • 1360-3116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5173
OpenAlex
W2965929195
Cited by
78
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Inclusive Education (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
Keywords
inclusive education, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, concluding observations, children with disabilities, school segregation, children's rights, disability rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review