CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 148

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social movements as ‘critical urban planning’ agents

de Souza, Marcelo Lopes·2006·City
DOI 10.1080/13604810600982347
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Curiously, even progressive planners usually share with their conservative counterparts the assumption that the state is the sole urban planning agent. This paper outlines that even if the state is sometimes controlled by more or less progressive forces and even influenced by social movements, civil society should be seen as a powerful actor in the conception and implementation of urban planning and management. Drawing on examples from urban social movements in Latin America, in particular favela activism, the sem‐teto movement and participatory budgeting, it explores how civil society can conceive, and even implement, complex, radically alternative socio‐spatial strategies. This can be seen as part of a genuine attempt at ‘grassroots urban planning’.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13604810600982347

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Abers R., 2000, Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil, 10.1515/9781626371378 · DOI
  2. Barrio H., 2005, Defensa del autonomismo
  3. Bookchin M., 1992, Urbanization without Cities: The Rise and Decline of Citizenship
  4. Castells M., 1983, The City and the Grassroots: A Cross‐Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements
  5. Castoriadis C., 1975, L’institution imaginaire de la société
  6. Castoriadis C., 1983, Socialismo ou barbárie
  7. Castoriadis C., 1985, A experiência do movimento operário
  8. Castoriadis C., 1990, Le monde morcelé—Les carrefours du labyrinthe III
  9. Castoriadis C., 1990, Le monde morcelé—Les carrefours du labyrinthe III
  10. Castoriadis C., 1996, La montée de l’insignifiance—Les carrefours du labyrinthe IV
  11. Castoriadis C., 1999, Figures du pensable—Les carrefours du labyrinthe VI
  12. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.10.004 · DOI
  13. Cooke B., 2001, Participation: The New Tyranny?
  14. Cooke B., 2001, Participation: The New Tyranny?
  15. Cox K., 1982, Conflict, Politics and the Urban Scene
  16. Enzensberger H. M., 1993, Aussichten auf den Bürgerkrieg
  17. Foucault M., 1984, Microfísica do poder,
  18. Foucault M., 2005, Analytik der Macht
  19. 10.2307/490503 · DOI
  20. Harvey D., 2000, Spaces of Hope
  21. Kohan A., 2002, Una historia de los movimentos piqueteros y caceroleros de los ’90 al 2002
  22. Kothari U., 2001, Participation: The New Tyranny?
  23. Kropotkin P., 1904, Landwirtschaft, Industrie und Handwerk
  24. Kurz R., 1991, Der Kollaps der Modernisierung
  25. Kurz R., 2005, Das Weltkapital
  26. Massetti A., 2004, Piqueteros: protesta social e identidad colectiva
  27. Michels R., 1989, Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie
  28. MTST [Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem Teto], 2004, Projeto político do Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem Teto
  29. Nietzsche F., 1994, Also sprach Zarathustra
  30. Poulantzas N., 1980, State Power Socialism
  31. 10.1111/1468-2427.00436 · DOI
  32. Sandercock L., 1998, Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural History of Planning, 10.1525/9780520918573 · DOI
  33. Santos C. N. F., 1981, Movimentos urbanos no Rio de Janeiro
  34. Silva A. A. da, 1990, Espaço & Debates, 30, 28
  35. Souza M. L. de, 2000, O desafio metropolitano. Um estudo sobre a problemática sócio‐espacial nas metrópoles brasileiras
  36. 10.1080/713665887 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0016-7185(01)00018-5 · DOI
  38. Souza M. L. de, 2002, Mudar a cidade. Uma introdução crítica ao planejamento e à gestão urbanos
  39. 10.3828/idpr.27.1.2 · DOI
  40. Touraine A., 1973, Production de la société
  41. Zibechi R., 1999, La mirada horizontal
  42. Zibechi R., 2005, ¿Qué hay de común entre piqueteros y zapatistas?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 148

Metadata

Authors
de Souza, M. L.
Venue
City
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2006-12
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
327-342
ISSN
  • 1360-4813
  • 1470-3629
DOI
10.1080/13604810600982347
Cited by
148
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social movements as ‘critical urban planning’ agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13604810600982347
The paper
de Souza, M. L. (2006). Social movements as ‘critical urban planning’ agents. City. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600982347