The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a new epistemology of the urban?
Abstract
New forms of urbanization are unfolding around the world that challenge inherited conceptions of the urban as a fixed, bounded and universally generalizable settlement type. Meanwhile, debates on the urban question continue to proliferate and intensify within the social sciences, the planning and design disciplines, and in everyday political struggles. Against this background, this paper revisits the question of the epistemology of the urban: through what categories, methods and cartographies should urban life be understood? After surveying some of the major contemporary mainstream and critical responses to this question, we argue for a radical rethinking of inherited epistemological assumptions regarding the urban and urbanization. Building upon reflexive approaches to critical social theory and our own ongoing research on planetary urbanization, we present a new epistemology of the urban in a series of seven theses. This epistemological framework is intended to clarify the intellectual and political stakes of contemporary debates on the urban question and to offer an analytical basis for deciphering the rapidly changing geographies of urbanization and urban struggle under early 21st-century capitalism. Our arguments are intended to ignite and advance further debate on the epistemological foundations for critical urban theory and practice today.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crutzen, P. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415023a · Cited by 4,788
The art of not being governed: an anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6429 · Cited by 3,940
Batty, M. (2013) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9399.001.0001 · Cited by 1,700
A unified theory of urban living
Bettencourt, L., & West, G. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/467912a · Cited by 1,009
Cited by
Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies
Robinson, J. (2016) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132515598025 · Cited by 659
The Capitalocene Part II: accumulation by appropriation and the centrality of unpaid work/energy
Moore, J. W. (2018) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1272587 · Cited by 445
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Cole, H., & Pearsall, H. (2019) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132518803799 · Cited by 416
Relational comparison revisited: Marxist postcolonial geographies in practice*
Hart, G. (2018) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132516681388 · Cited by 382
Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism
Schindler, S. (2017) · City · doi:10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Brenner, N., & Schmid, C.
- Venue
- City
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-04-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 151-182
- ISSN
- 1360-4813 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-3629
- OpenAlex
- W2017568810
- Cited by
- 1,532
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 435.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a new epistemology of the urban? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
- The paper
- Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.