CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relation of entrapment, shame and guilt to depression, in carers of people with dementia

Open access
Martin, Y., Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Irons, C.·2006·Aging & Mental Health
DOI 10.1080/13607860500311953
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is increasing research exploring depression in carers of people with dementia. This study explored the relation of entrapment, shame and guilt to depression in a group of 70 carers of those with dementia. As in other studies the experience of entrapment in the role was highly related to depression. Moreover, experiences of shame relating to self-criticism, other people's expectations and the fear of their criticism were significantly related to depression, entrapment and guilt. Guilt however, as focused on the fears of harming others, letting others down and sense of responsibility, was not associated with depression or entrapment. Depression in carers may relate in part to feeling trapped in a role but also being vulnerable to criticism and feelings of inadequacy in that role. In this study, degree of behavioural disturbance/dependence was not found to be significantly associated with any of the research variables.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607860500311953

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Gotlib IH, 1992, Psychological aspects of depression: Toward a cognitive-interpersonal integration
  3. 10.1037/0021-843X.94.2.169 · DOI
  4. Pattie C, 1979, Manual of the Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly (CAPE)
  5. 10.1037/0021-843X.101.3.469 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0882-7974.5.4.502 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 114

Related

Metadata

Authors
Martin, Y., Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., & Irons, C.
Affiliations
a Mental Health Research Unit , Kingsway Hospital , Derby, UK
Corresponding author
Gilbert, P.
ORCID
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
101-106
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
DOI
10.1080/13607860500311953
OpenAlex
W2140780877
Cited by
114
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
depression, dementia caregivers, entrapment, shame, guilt, caregiver role, self-criticism, fear of criticism, behavioral problems, dependency, caregiver burden
MeSH terms
Dementia, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Guilt, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Shame, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review