Cited by 24Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Thought suppression and treatment outcome in late-life depression

Rosenthal, M. Z, Cheavens, J. S., Compton, J. S., Thorp, S. R., Lynch, T. R.·2005·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

This study examined severity of depression, age of onset, and thought suppression as predictors of treatment outcome. Measures were taken pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at six-month follow-up in 34 depressed older adults receiving the treatment protocol described in Lynch, Morse, Mendelson & Robins (Dialectical behavior therapy for depressed older adults, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 33-45, 2003). Severity and chronicity of depression and higher levels of thought suppression were associated with higher depressive symptoms six months after treatment. Findings are consistent with research suggesting that severity and chronicity of depression predict poor clinical outcome. In addition, these results provide preliminary evidence that the tendency to cope with unwanted thoughts by deliberate attempts to not experience such thoughts may be an important pre-treatment predictor of outcome among depressed older adults. Larger studies are needed to explore whether thought suppression mediates long-term recovery from depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607860512331334040

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thought suppression is associated with worse outcomes after depression treatment in older adults.

    “Furthermore, engaging in thought suppression has been associated with poorer outcomes in older adults following treatment for depression (Rosenthal, Cheavens, Compton, Thorp, & Lynch, 2005).”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy With Older Adults: Rationale and Considerations (2013) · cites this paper as Rosenthal, Cheavens, Compton, Thorp, & Lynch, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenthal, M. Z., Cheavens, J. S., Compton, J. S., Thorp, S. R., & Lynch, T. R.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenthal, M. Z
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2005-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
35-39
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W1981961803
Cited by
24
References
15
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John A. Hartford Foundation
  • Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P30 MH401159-14, R03MH057799)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
thought suppression, geriatric depression, older adults, treatment outcomes, depression severity, age of onset, chronicity of depression, dialectical behavior therapy, prognostic factors, intrusive thoughts
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review