Cited by 58Aging and Gerontology ResearchResilience and Mental HealthAging, Health, and Disability

Coping trajectories in later life: A 20-year predictive study

Open access
Brennan, P.L., Holland, J.M., Schutte, K.K., Moos, R.H.·2012·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND METHOD: Information about aging-related change in coping is limited mainly to results of cross-sectional studies of age differences in coping, and no research has focused on predictors of aging-related change in coping behavior. To extend research in this area, we used longitudinal multilevel modeling to describe older adults' (n = 719; baseline M = 61 years) 20-year, intraindividual approach and avoidance coping trajectories, and to determine the influence of two sets of predictors (threat appraisal and stressor characteristics; gender and baseline personal and social resources) on level and rate of change in these trajectories. RESULTS: Over the 20-year study interval, participants declined in the use of approach coping and most avoidance coping strategies, but there was significant variation in this trend. In simultaneous predictive models, female gender, more threat appraisal, stressor severity, social resources, and depressive symptoms, and fewer financial resources were independently associated with higher initial levels of coping responses. Having more social resources, and fewer financial resources, at baseline in late-middle-age predicted faster decline over time in approach coping. Having more baseline depressive symptoms, and fewer baseline financial resources, hastened decline in use of avoidance coping. Independent of other variables in these models, decline over time in approach coping and avoidance coping remained statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Overall decline in coping may be a normative pattern of coping change in later life. However, it also is modifiable by older adults' stressor appraisals, their stressors, and the personal and social resources they possess at entry to later life, in late-middle-age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2011.628975

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiential avoidance is associated with elevated anxiety, depression, FCR, and fatigue, and is higher in females than males.

    “EA entails any behavioural or cognitive evasion of experience that one finds unpleasant or unappealing, and is associated with elevated anxiety, depression, FCR, and fatigue, and is also higher in females than males.45-47”

    From Mindfulness and Psychosocial Symptoms in People with Cancer: Testing Rumination and Experiential Avoidance as Mediators, and Sex as a Moderator. (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results (Avoidance Coping; page unavailable) associate higher initial avoidance coping with female gender and more depressive symptoms. The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) describe cognitive and behavioral avoidance, but the paper measures avoidance coping rather than experiential avoidance specifically. The passages do not support associations with anxiety, fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), or fatigue. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Moos RH Cronkite RC Finney JW 1992 Health and Daily Living Form manual 2 Palo Alto, CA Consulting Psychologists Press
  2. Singer JD Willett JB 2003 Applied longitudinal data analysis New York, NY Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brennan, P. L., Holland, J. M., Schutte, K. K., & Moos, R. H.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Brennan, P.L.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2012-03-07
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
305-316
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W1988051307
Cited by
57
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Health Services Research and Development
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA15685, AA017477, R01AA015685, R01AA017477)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
approach coping, avoidance coping, aging, older adults, threat appraisal, social resources, financial resources, depressive symptoms, gender differences, late middle age, stress appraisal
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aging, Depression, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Social Class, Social Support, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review