The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality of life in dementia: a systematically conducted narrative review of dementia-specific measurement scales
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ascertaining the quality of life (QoL) in people with dementia is important for evaluating service outcomes and cost-effectiveness. This paper identifies QoL measures for people with dementia and assesses their properties. METHOD: A systematic narrative review identified articles using dementia QoL measures. Electronic databases searched were AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Index to Theses, IBSS, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and Web of Science. All available years and languages (if with an English language abstract) were included. RESULTS: Searches yielded 6806 citations; 3043 were multiple duplicates (759 being true duplicates). Abstracts were read; 182 full papers were selected/obtained, of which 126 were included as relevant. Few measures were based on rigorous conceptual frameworks. Some referenced Lawton's model (Dementia Quality of Life [DQOL] and Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease [QOL-AD]), though these tapped part of this only; others claimed relationship to a health-related QoL concept (e.g. DEMQOL), though had less social relevance; others were based on limited domains (e.g. activity, affect) or clinical opinions (Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia [QUALID]). Many measures were based on proxy assessments or observations of people with dementia's QoL, rather than their own ratings. The Bath Assessment of Subjective Quality of Life in Dementia (BASQID) was developed involving people with dementia and caregivers, but excluded some of their main themes. All measures were tested on selective samples only (ranging from community to hospital clinics, or subsamples/waves of existing population surveys), in a few sites. Their general applicability remains unknown, and predictive validity remains largely untested. CONCLUSION: The lack of consensus on measuring QoL in dementia suggests a need for a broader, more rigorously tested QoL measure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.
Fitzpatrick, Davey, Buxton, & Jones (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2140 · Cited by 1,715
Cited by
van der Flier, W. M., Skoog, I., Schneider, J. A., Pantoni, L., Mok, V., Chen, C. L. H., & Scheltens, P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.3 · Cited by 594
Hearing loss as a risk factor for dementia: A systematic review
Thomson, R. S., Auduong, P., Miller, A. T., & Gurgel, R. K. (2017) · Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/lio2.65 · Cited by 332
El-Hayek, Y. H., Wiley, R. E., Khoury, C. P., Daya, R. P., Ballard, C., Evans, A. R., Karran, M., Molinuevo, J. L., Norton, M., & Atri, A. (2019) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-190426 · Cited by 216
Wu, Y., Clare, L., Jones, I. R., Martyr, A., Nelis, S. M., Quinn, C., Victor, C. R., Lamont, R. A., Rippon, I., Matthews, F. E., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4998 · Cited by 50
Kerkhof, Y. J., Rabiee, F., & Willems, C. G. (2015) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301213504210 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowling, A., Rowe, G., Adams, S., Sands, P., Samsi, K., Crane, M., Joly, L., & Manthorpe, J.
- Venue
- Aging & Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-06-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-31
- ISSN
- 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6915
- OpenAlex
- W2094824056
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of life in dementia: a systematically conducted narrative review of dementia-specific measurement scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13607863.2014.915923
- The paper
- Bowling, A., Rowe, G., Adams, S., Sands, P., Samsi, K., Crane, M., Joly, L., & Manthorpe, J. (2015). Quality of life in dementia: a systematically conducted narrative review of dementia-specific measurement scales. Aging & Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.915923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.