Cited by 23Technology Use by Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Experiences of using a memory aid to structure and support daily activities in a small-scale group accommodation for people with dementia

Kerkhof, Yvonne JF, Rabiee, Fatemeh, Willems, Charles G·2015·Dementia

Abstract

Background: Use of technology to structure and support the daily activities of the residents in a small-scale group accommodation (SSGA) for dementia is a new innovation in the Netherlands. This paper presents the process of development of this new way of structuring activities and the findings of a pilot study looking at the experiences of using this device in people with dementia. Method: A qualitative method was chosen, data were collected using individual interviews with the residents ( n = 6), focus groups interviews with informal carers ( n = 5) and members of staff ( n = 6). Data were analysed using Ritchie & Spencer’s framework (1994) . Findings: Three main themes emerged: issues regarding the implementation, needs for further development and the learning experiences acquired during the development. The majority of the residents were happy with the use and function of the memory aid. However, the occurrence of installation errors, limited ease of use and a lack of knowledge regarding the function and use of the memory aid were issues that prevented a successful implementation. Findings highlighted shared views about ways of improving through adaptation of the software program and additional technological applications; internet connectivity, improving its accessibility by using a remote control and adding videos and photos. Conclusion: Lessons are learned about the use and transferability of this innovation in people with dementia and other vulnerable target groups including those with learning disabilities as well as its limitation and the needs for further development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1471301213504210

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerkhof, Y. J., Rabiee, F., & Willems, C. G.
Affiliations
  • Saxion (NL)
  • Birmingham City University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kerkhof, Yvonne JF
Venue
Dementia
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
633-649
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W2026154952
Cited by
23
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
memory aids, assistive technology, implementation, ease of use, informal caregivers, residents' experiences, technological progress, learning disabilities, remote control
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Humans, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Pilot Projects, Software, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review