The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What are the factors that facilitate or hinder resilience in older spousal dementia carers? A qualitative study
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Much is known about the factors making caring for a spouse with dementia burdensome. However, relatively little is known about factors that help some spouses become resilient. We define resilience as 'the process of negotiating, managing and adapting to significant sources of stress or trauma'. We aimed to assess whether spousal dementia carers can achieve resilience and to highlight which assets and resources they draw on to facilitate or hinder resilience, using an ecological framework . METHOD: Twenty in-depth qualitative interviews with spousal carers from two carer support groups and a care home in North West England. RESULTS: Eight participants were resilient and 12 were not. A resilient carer was characterised as someone who stays positive and actively maintained their relationship and loved one's former self. Resilient carers were knowledgeable and well supported by family but especially friends, with whom they shared this knowledge. They were more actively engaged with services such as respite care. CONCLUSION: There is a need to move towards more ecological models of resilience. We propose that access to assets and resources is not always sufficient to facilitate resilience. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, resilience has been examined in a number of contexts: natural disasters [12, 13], bereavement [14], dementia care [15, 16], poverty [17], war [18] and other traumas [19, 20].”
From Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903 · Cited by 20,808
Bonanno, G. A. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.20 · Cited by 6,851
The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back
Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/10705500802222972 · Cited by 6,439 · cited 1×
“Maintaining continuity showed that resilience is about bouncing back to previous functioning rather than flourishing beyond previous functioning (Smith et al., 2008; Windle & Bennett, 2011); it could be those carers who need to adapt least who are most resilient.”
BackgroundGoulding, C. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849209236 · Cited by 5,182
What is resilience? A review and concept analysis.
Windle, G. (2011) · Reviews in Clinical Gerontology · doi:10.1017/s0959259810000420 · Cited by 1,761 · cited 2×
“In light of these limitations, Windle (2011) defined resilience thus ‘The process of effectively negotiating, adapting to, or managing significant sources of stress or trauma.”
BackgroundPinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187 · Cited by 1,549
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2003) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/58.2.p112 · Cited by 1,108 · cited 2×
“Pinquart and S€orensen (2003), in an extensive review, noted that most studies centred on burden.”
BackgroundThe Social Ecology of Resilience
Ungar, M. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3 · Cited by 1,084
Charmaz, K. (1995) · Rethinking Methods in Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446221792.n3 · Cited by 650
Haley, W. E., Levine, E. G., Brown, S. L., & Bartolucci, A. A. (1987) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.2.4.323 · Cited by 602
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1037/0882-7974.2.4.323 · DOI
- Voelkl J.E., 1998, Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 32, 231
- Windle G., 2011, The social ecology of resilience, 219
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carer‐related research and knowledge: Findings from a scoping review
Larkin, M., Henwood, M., & Milne, A. J. (2018) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.12586 · Cited by 124
Cross, A. J., Garip, G., & Sheffield, D. (2018) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2018.1496250 · Cited by 122
The impact of caring for family members with mental illnesses on the caregiver: a scoping review
Phillips, R., Durkin, M. A., Engward, H., Cable, G., & Iancu, M. (2022) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daac049 · Cited by 129
Resilience in family caregiving for people with dementia: A systematic review
Teahan, Á., Lafferty, A., McAuliffe, É., Phelan, A. A., O’Sullivan, L., O’Shea, D., & Fealy, G. (2018) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4972 · Cited by 106
Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model
Panzeri, A., Bertamini, M., Butter, S., Levita, L., Gibson-Miller, J., Vidotto, G., Bentall, R. P., & Bennett, K. M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256041 · Cited by 99
“Following the concept analysis and definition developed by Windle [11], Windle and Bennett [21] developed the ecological model of resilience (Fig 1) which was originally developed in relationship to caregiving but has subsequently been used in other contexts, for example amongst older people living in poverty in Colom…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnellan, W. J., Bennett, K. M., & Soulsby, L. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Donnellan, Warren J.
- Venue
- Aging & Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-11-20
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 932-939
- ISSN
- 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6915
- OpenAlex
- W2154565138
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Keywords
- resilience, elderly caregivers, dementia caregiving, ecological model, social support, respite care, carer support groups, relationship maintenance, carer stress, family support
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Dementia, England, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Home Nursing, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Respite Care, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Spouses, Qualitative Research, Resilience, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
