Cited by 31Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Psychotropic drug prescription for nursing home residents with dementia: prevalence and associations with non-resident-related factors

Open access
Smeets, Claudia H. W., Gerritsen, Debby L., Zuidema, Sytse U., Teerenstra, Steven, van der Spek, Klaas, Smalbrugge, Martin, Koopmans, Raymond T. C. M.·2018·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine psychotropic drug prescription rates in nursing home residents with dementia and to identify associations with the so far understudied psychosocial non-resident-related factors. METHOD: A cross-sectional, observational, exploratory design as part of PROPER I (PRescription Optimization of Psychotropic drugs in Elderly nuRsing home patients with dementia). Participants were 559 nursing home residents with dementia, 25 physicians, and 112 nurses in the Netherlands. Psychotropic drug prescription, non-resident-related and known resident-related variables were measured to operationalize the themes of our previous qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of residents were prescribed any psychotropic drug, 25% antipsychotics, 29% antidepressants, 15% anxiolytics, and 13% hypnotics, with large differences between the units. Multivariate multilevel regression analyses revealed that antipsychotic prescription was less likely with higher physicians' availability (odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.00) and that antidepressant prescription was more likely with higher satisfaction of nurses on resident contact (odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.00-2.25). Resident-related factors explained 6%-15% of the variance, resident- and non-resident-related factors together 8%-17%. CONCLUSION: Prescription rates for antipsychotics are similar compared to other countries, and relatively low for antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotics. Our findings indicate that improvement of prescribing could provisionally best be targeted at resident-related factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2017.1348469

Cites

45 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rates of psychotropic prescribing are particularly high across care homes in Western Europe, where up to 63% of residents are prescribed at least one psychotropic drug.

    “Rates of prescribing are particularly high across care homes, where studies in the Western Europe have shown that up to 63% of residents are prescribed at least one psychotropic drug [5–8].”

    From Stakeholders' views on the use of psychotropic medication in older people: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction describes psychotropic drugs as widely prescribed in nursing home residents with dementia. The Prevalence rates section reports 56% of residents in the Dutch study received at least one psychotropic drug, with rates reaching 75% at some nursing home locations. It does not report a 63% figure or establish that figure as an upper rate across Western European care homes; its study population was residents with dementia. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The findings of this review help explain the findings of previous studies that have shown high rates of inappropriate psychotropic prescribing in older people both in care homes and wider settings.

    “The findings of this review help explain the findings of previous studies that have shown high rates of inappropriate psychotropic prescribing in older people both in care homes [4–7] and wider settings [83].”

    From Stakeholders' views on the use of psychotropic medication in older people: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction reports widespread psychotropic prescribing among nursing-home residents with dementia, and the Prevalence rates section reports that 56% of residents in this study received a psychotropic drug. Neither passage establishes that those prescriptions were inappropriate; this study measured prescription rates, not rates of inappropriate prescribing. The citation to Smeets is in the care-home group [4–7], not the separate citation [83] for wider settings. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Landeweerd, J. A., Boumans, N., & Nissen, J. M. F. (1996). Arbeidsvoldoen- ing bij verplegenden en verzorgenden. De Maastrichtse arbeidssatis- factieschaal voor de gezondheidszorg [Job satisfaction of nurses and nursing assistants. The Maastricht Work Satisfaction Scale for Health- care]. In C.C. van Beek, T.C. van Dorsten & G.J. Stam (Eds.), Handboek Verpleegkundige innovatie (pp. 3-23). Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
  2. Lintern, T. (2001). Quality in dementia care: Evaluating staff attitudes and behaviour (PhD thesis). University of Wales, Bangor.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smeets, C. H. W., Gerritsen, D. L., Zuidema, S. U., Teerenstra, S., van der Spek, K., Smalbrugge, M., & Koopmans, R. T. C. M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Primary and Community Care, Center for Family Medicine, Geriatric Care and Public Health, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Smeets, Claudia H. W.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2017-07-20
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1244-1252
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2738083022
Cited by
31
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research (ZonMw) and Development (113101005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
psychotropic drugs, dementia, nursing home residents, antipsychotic prescribing, antidepressant prescribing, anxiolytic prescribing, hypnotic prescribing, physician availability, nursing satisfaction, prescribing optimization, long-term care
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Female, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Male, Medical Staff, Netherlands, Nursing Homes, Nursing Staff, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Drug Prescriptions, Psychotropic Drugs, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review