Quality of life in caregivers of patients with multiple myeloma
Open accessAbstract
Objectives : This study aimed to assess the relationship between sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables with quality of life (QoL) and the moderating role of caregivers' age and caregiving duration in caregivers of patients with Multiple Myeloma. Method : The sample included 118 caregivers who completed questionnaires that assessed psychological morbidity, satisfaction with social support, coping, burden, unmet needs, and QoL. Results : High psychological morbidity, burden and information, financial and emotional unmet needs were associated with lower QoL, while higher satisfaction with social support and more effective use of coping strategies were associated with better QoL. Women caregivers reported more satisfaction with social support and those who did not choose to care reported greater financial unmet needs and more use of coping strategies. The relationship between caregivers' psychological morbidity/social support and QoL was mediated by emotional needs and double mediated by coping and burden. The caregivers' age moderated the relationship between psychological morbidity/social support and emotional needs. Conclusion: Interventions to support the caregiver's emotional needs to promote their QoL are needed. These should be particularly tailored for older caregivers reporting greater psychological morbidity and younger caregivers less satisfied with their social support, as they have a negative indirect impact on their QoL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
13 studies indicated the need of developing coping strategies to improve management and control of both the situation and emotional strain, and to help increase training in caregivers, thus improving self-efficacy while reducing emotional impact.
“Thirteen studies [23,24,27,30,32,35,37,38,45,46,47,49,54] indicated the need of developing coping strategies to improve the management and control of both the situation and the emotional strain, and also to help increase training in caregivers, thus improving their self-efficacy while reducing the emotional impact.”
From Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Cites
Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer
Stenberg, U., Ruland, C. M., & Miaskowski, C. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1670 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Sklenarova, H., Krümpelmann, A., Haun, M. W., Friederich, H., Huber, J., Thomas, M., Winkler, E. C., Herzog, W., & Hartmann, M. (2015) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29223 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
The unmet needs of partners and caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review
Lambert, S. D., Harrison, J. D., Smith, E., Bonevski, B., Carey, M., Lawsin, C., Paul, C., & Girgis, A. (2012) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000226 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Family members of cancer patients: Needs, quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression
Friðriksdóttir, N., Sævarsdóttir, Þ., Halfdánardóttir, S. Í., Jónsdóttir, A., Magnúsdóttir, H., Ólafsdóttir, K. L., Guðmundsdóttir, G., & Gunnarsdóttir, S. (2011) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.3109/0284186x.2010.529821 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review
Guerra-Martín, M. D., Casado-Espinosa, M. D. R., Gavira-López, Y., Holgado-Castro, C., López-Latorre, I., & Borrallo-Riego, Á. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20021570 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“, 2020 [46] Assess the relation between sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables with quality of life and the moderating role of caregivers’ age and the caregiving duration in caregivers of patients with multiple myeloma.”
Background
- Authors
- Pereira, M. G., Vilaça, M., Pinheiro, M., Ferreira, G., Pereira, M., Faria, S., Monteiro, S., & Bacalhau, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Minho (PT)
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Pereira, M. Graça
- ORCID
- Venue
- Aging & Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-05-25
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1402-1410
- ISSN
- 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6915
- OpenAlex
- W2945883078
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Portuguese Associations of Portuguese Association
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- quality of life, caregivers, multiple myeloma, caregiver burden, coping strategies, social support, psychological morbidity, unmet needs, emotional needs, caregiver age, caregiving duration, mediation, moderation, women caregivers
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review