Cited by 196Cancer survivorship and careFamily Support in IllnessNursing care and research

Family members of cancer patients: Needs, quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression

Open access
Friðriksdóttir, Nanna, Sævarsdóttir, Þórunn, Halfdánardóttir, Svandís Íris, Jónsdóttir, Arndís, Magnúsdóttir, Hrefna, Ólafsdóttir, Kristín Lára, Guðmundsdóttir, Guðbjörg, Gunnarsdóttir, Sigríður·2011·Acta Oncologica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Family members of cancer patient's have multiple needs, many of which are not adequately met. Unmet needs may affect psychological distress and quality of life (QOL). The purpose of this study was to assess needs and unmet needs, QOL, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and the relationship between those variables in a large sample of family members of cancer patients in different phases of illness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of 332 family members invited to participate, 330 accepted and 223 (67%) completed a cross-sectional, descriptive study. Data was collected with the Family Inventory of Needs (FIN), Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Of 20 needs assessed the mean (SD) number of important needs and unmet needs was 16.4 ± 4.3 and 6.2 ± 5.6, respectively. Twelve important needs were unmet in 40-56% of the sample. The mean number of unmet needs was significantly higher among women than men, other relatives than spouses, younger family members, those currently working and those of patients with metastatic cancer. QOL was similar to what has been reported for healthy populations and cancer caregivers in advanced stages. The prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression was high (20-40%). Anxiety scores were higher among women than men and both anxiety and depression scores were highest during years 1-5 compared to the first year and more than five years post diagnosis. There was a positive relationship between number of important needs and QOL, and between needs met and QOL. Additionally, there was a significant relationship between anxiety and unmet needs. Finally, there was a significant relationship between QOL and symptoms of anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: The results support the importance of screening needs and psychological distress among family members of cancer patients in all phases of illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0284186x.2010.529821

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence estimate of anxiety is substantially greater in relation to dementia than in family carers of people with other conditions such as cancer and stroke.

    “Furthermore, the prevalence estimate of anxiety is substantially greater in relation to dementia, than family carers of people with other conditions such as cancer (Friðriksdóttir et al., 2011) and stroke (Loh, Tan, Zhang, & Ho, 2017).”

    From Exploring the impact of carer stressors and psychological inflexibility on depression and anxiety in family carers of people with dementia (2020) · cites this paper as Friðriksdóttir et al., 2011

    The Symptoms of anxiety and depression section reports possible anxiety symptoms or anxiety symptoms in 20% of the sampled family members of cancer patients. That supports the cancer-carer estimate, but the paper does not compare it with dementia carers or establish that the dementia estimate is substantially greater. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. QOLS): Reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:60. Available from: http://hqlo.com/ content/1/1/60. Accessed date 30 June 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friðriksdóttir, N., Sævarsdóttir, Þ., Halfdánardóttir, S. Í., Jónsdóttir, A., Magnúsdóttir, H., Ólafsdóttir, K. L., Guðmundsdóttir, G., & Gunnarsdóttir, S.
Affiliations
  • National University Hospital of Iceland (IS)
  • University of Iceland (IS)
Venue
Acta Oncologica
Published
2011-01-13
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
252-258
ISSN
  • 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-226X
OpenAlex
W2028993037
Cited by
196
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Oncologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
family caregivers, relatives of cancer patients, unmet needs, quality of life, anxiety, depression, psychological distress, metastatic cancer, gender differences, spousal caregivers, disease duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Family, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review