The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Techno-fixes for an ageing society
Open accessAbstract
For some time there has been a keen interest in developing Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotics as solutions to the ageing of society and the growing crisis of social care. Futuristic scenario...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Technologies for older adults are often directed toward those least able to exercise control but who are most susceptible to being controlled by others.
“Higgs and Gilleard (2021) describe an asymmetrical bifurcation in which technologies for older adults are often directed “toward those least able to exercise control but who are most susceptible to being controlled by others” (p. 1).”
From Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes (2022) · cites this paper as Higgs and Gilleard, 2021
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Bastani A., 2019, Fully automated luxury communism
- 10.1017/S0144686X15001269 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780429278266-18 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4_1 · DOI
- 10.1080/17483107.2018.1448470 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.robot.2017.12.008 · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230316720 · DOI
- 10.3390/s19040766 · DOI
- Higgs P., 2016, Personhood, identity and care in advanced old age
- 10.1038/d41586-019-02939-0 · DOI
- 10.1177/0969733014533237 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1041610210000037 · DOI
- Reese B., 2018, The fourth age: Smart robots, conscious computers and the future of humanity
- Rodriquez J., 2014, Labors of love: Nursing homes and the structures of care work, 10.18574/nyu/9781479843572.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.2196/15429 · DOI
- Schraft, R. D., Schaeffer, C. & May, T. (1998). Care-O-bot/sup TM: The concept of a system for assisting elderly or disabled persons in home environments [Paper presentation]. IECON’98. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (Cat. No. 98CH36200) (Vol. 4, pp. 2476–2481). IEEE. · DOI
- 10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Smarr, C. A., Prakash, A., Beer, J. M., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C. & Rogers, W. A. (2012). Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting(Vol. 56, pp. 153–157). SAGE Publications. · DOI
- 10.1007/s00146-015-0625-4 · DOI
- 10.1108/QAOA-03-2018-0010 · DOI
- 10.1080/13511610.2021.1909460 · DOI
- 10.3390/socsci8040110 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes
Berridge, C., & Grigorovich, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2022.957246 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gilleard, Chris
- Venue
- Aging & Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-11-26
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1303-1305
- ISSN
- 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-6915
- OpenAlex
- W3216584510
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Policies and Healthcare Reform
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- aging society, artificial intelligence, robotics, technical solutions, elderly care, future scenarios
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review