Cited by 68Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesPatient Dignity and PrivacyAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with surveillance technologies in residential care

Open access
Niemeijer, Alistair R, Depla, Marja FIA, Frederiks, Brenda JM, Hertogh, Cees MPM·2015·Nursing Ethics

Abstract

Background: Surveillance technology such as tag and tracking systems and video surveillance could increase the freedom of movement and consequently autonomy of clients in long-term residential care settings, but is also perceived as an intrusion on autonomy including privacy. Objective: To explore how clients in residential care experience surveillance technology in order to assess how surveillance technology might influence autonomy. Setting: Two long-term residential care facilities: a nursing home for people with dementia and a care facility for people with intellectual disabilities. Methods: Ethnographic field study. Ethical considerations: The boards representing clients and relatives/proxies of the clients were informed of the study and gave their written consent. The clients’ assent was sought through a special information leaflet. At any time clients and/or proxy were given the option to withdraw from the study. The research protocol was also reviewed by a medical ethics committee. Findings: Our findings show a pattern of two themes: (1) coping with new spaces which entailed clients: wandering around, getting lost, being triggered, and retreating to new spaces and (2) resisting the surveillance technology measure because clients feel stigmatized, missed the company, and do not like being “watched.” Conclusion: Client experiences of surveillance technology appear to entail a certain ambivalence. This is in part due to the variety in surveillance technology devices, with each device bringing its own connotations and experiences. But it also lies in the devices’ presupposition of an ideal user, which is at odds with the actual user who is inherently vulnerable. Surveillance technology can contribute to the autonomy of clients in long-term care, but only if it is set in a truly person-centered approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0969733014533237

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surveillance technologies are adopted within nursing homes to remotely monitor older adults and workers with an interest in improving quality of care, health, and safety.

    “Surveillance technologies are adopted within nursing homes to remotely monitor older adults and workers with an interest in improving quality of care, health, and safety”

    From Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes (2022) · cites this paper as Niemeijer et al., 2015

    The Introduction describes surveillance technologies in residential care that alert staff to danger, and the device description reports cameras monitored from nurses’ offices or other central locations. These passages support remote monitoring of residents for safety, but the paper does not describe adopting the technologies to monitor workers or establish improving quality of care and health as the stated aims. Its settings also include a facility for people with intellectual disabilities, not only a nursing home for older adults. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Hughes JC, Newby J, Louw SJ, et al. Ethical issues and tagging in dementia: a survey. J Ethics Ment Health 2008; 3: 1-6.
  2. Eltis K. Predicating dignity on autonomy? The need for further inquiry into the ethics of tagging and tracking dementia patients with GPS technology. Elder LJ 2005; 13: 387-411.
  3. Hertogh CMPM. Between autonomy and security: ethical questions in the care of elderly persons with dementia in nursing homes. In: Jones GMM and Miesen BML (eds) Care-giving in dementia. East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge, 2005, pp. 375-390.
  4. Niemeijer AR, Frederiks BJM, Riphagen II, et al. Ethical and practical concerns of surveillance technologies in residential care for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: an overview of the literature. Int Psychogeriatr 2010; 4: 1-14.
  5. Hoare KJ, Buetow S, Mills J, et al. Using an emic and etic ethnographic technique in a grounded theory study of information use by practice nurses in New Zealand. J Res Nurs. Epub ahead of print 25 May 2012. DOI: 10.1177/ 1744987111434190. · DOI
  6. Patrick H. Autonomy benefit and protection. How human rights can protect people with mental conditions or learning disabilities from unlawful deprivation of liberty. Edinburgh: Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland, 2008, pp. 1-52.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niemeijer, A. R., Depla, M. F., Frederiks, B. J., & Hertogh, C. M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Nursing Ethics
Published
2014-06-09
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
307-320
ISSN
  • 0969-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0989
OpenAlex
W2153658983
Cited by
68
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nursing Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Humanistic Studies OAI Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars
  • Stichting Dioraphte
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
surveillance technology, dementia, intellectual disability, residential care, long-term care, autonomy, privacy, video surveillance, electronic monitoring, wandering, stigmatization, person-centred care, customer experience, nursing homes
MeSH terms
Dementia, Humans, Long-Term Care, Netherlands, Population Surveillance, Residential Facilities, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Safety Management, Privacy, Persons with Intellectual Disabilities, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review