Cited by 339Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentHigher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Practises and Engagement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: findings from a literature review

Open access
Terrion, Jenepher Lennox, Leonard, Dominique·2007·Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning

Abstract

Peer mentoring in higher education is regarded as an effective intervention to ensure the success and retention of vulnerable students. Many universities and colleges have therefore implemented some form of mentoring program as part of their student support services. While considerable research supports the use of peer mentoring to improve academic performance and decrease student attrition, few studies link peer mentoring functions with the type of peer best suited to fulfill these functions. This literature review categorizes the abundant student peer mentor descriptors found in mentoring research. The result is a preliminary taxonomy that classifies ten peer mentor characteristics according to mentoring function served (career‐related or psychosocial). The proposed taxonomy and the discussion developed in this article help shed light on the dynamics of successful student peer mentoring relationships in higher education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13611260601086311

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037/0735-7028.33.1.88 · DOI
  2. Lahey , P. , Trant , M. , Verderber , R. F. and Verderber , K. S. 2005 . Communicate! , Toronto : Thomson Nelson .
  3. Myers , D. G. 1987 . Social psychology , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
  4. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.529 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Sipe , C. L. 1996 . Mentoring: a synthesis of P/PV research: 1988–1995 Available online at: www.ppv.org/ppv/publications/assets/40_publication.pdf (accessed 20 February 2005)
  6. 10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Terrion, J. L., & Leonard, D.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Terrion, Jenepher Lennox
Venue
Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning
Published
2007-05
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
149-164
ISSN
  • 1361-1267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9745
OpenAlex
W2151273171
Cited by
339
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning (publishedVersion)
  • uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
peer mentoring, mentor characteristics, mentoring functions, career mentoring, psychosocial mentoring, student retention, student attrition, student support services, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review