Cited by 59Critical Race Theory in EducationThemes in Literature AnalysisCultural and political discourse analysis

‘What could I say?’ A critical discourse analysis of the construction of race in children’s literature

Rogers, Rebecca, Christian, June·2007·Race Ethnicity and Education

Abstract

This article analyzes the construction of Whiteness in children’s literature that intentionally brings Whiteness to the surface. We wondered: do the authors re‐center Whiteness in their attempts to racialize White people? What literary strategies and linguistic techniques do the authors call on to present Whiteness and, subsequently, Blackness? Using a combination of critical analyses including intertextual and hermeneutical analyses as well as critical discourse analysis, we foreground the reconstructive and deconstructive aspects of White people talking about race. Our empirical analysis also relied on transactional theories of reading informed by cultural criticism and Whiteness studies. We focus on four themes that cut across the books in our findings: White talk, colorblind theories of race, historicizing racism, and the privileging effect. We demonstrate the ways in which the talk in texts between White characters sometimes recenters Whiteness and other times disrupts Whiteness as the center. We discuss our cooperative reflexivity as an inter‐racial research team conducting this inquiry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13613320601100351

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In U.S. education, a commitment to color-blind racial ideology conflated acknowledging race with being racist, and the implication for educators has been that refusing to recognize race is to be morally superior.

    “Wells' (2014) analysis of education policy and reform reflected that similar to law, a commitment to color-blind racial ideology in U.S. education conflated acknowledging race with being racist, and therefore the implications for educators have been to refuse to recognize race is to be morally superior (Rogers and Christian 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, R., & Christian, J.
Affiliations
University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Rebecca
Venue
Race Ethnicity and Education
Published
2007-02-04
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
21-46
ISSN
  • 1361-3324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-109X
OpenAlex
W2005310025
Cited by
59
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Race Ethnicity and Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Themes in Literature Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
Keywords
whiteness, children's literature, Blackness, colorblind racism, privilege, literary strategies, intertextuality, reflexivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review