Noise Management in Twenty-First Century Libraries: Case Studies of Four U.S. Academic Institutions
Abstract
University libraries have had to provide acceptable noise levels for many years and this pressure has not diminished in the twenty-first century. Library space has to be utilized to ensure noise levels are best managed. A study was undertaken across four university libraries in South Florida to determine how universities utilized their limited space to satisfy both individual and collaborative study needs of their students. Directors and key librarians were surveyed and interviewed, and on-site visits were conducted. Results supported findings from the literature indicating that it is best to observe students’ natural use of library space and designate those areas accordingly. Additionally, it was found that current pedagogical practices place a greater need for group study spaces, which compete against the vital need for quiet study areas. It was also discovered that designated floor levels used to separate sound are compromised by popular open mezzanine designs that allow sound to permeate between floors. Solutions are presented to minimize noise issues that can be applied at any academic library.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Academic Libraries: “Social” or “Communal?” The Nature and Future of Academic Libraries
Gayton, J. T. (2008) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.011 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quiet in the Library: An Evidence-Based Approach to Improving the Student Experience
McCaffrey, C., & Breen, M. (2016) · portal: Libraries and the Academy · doi:10.1353/pla.2016.0052 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Franks, J. E., & Asher, D. C.
- Affiliations
- Saint Leo University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Asher, Darla C.
- Venue
- New Review of Academic Librarianship
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-09-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-331
- ISSN
- 1361-4533 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-7834
- OpenAlex
- W2068435820
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Review of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
- Keywords
- academic libraries, library space utilization, collaborative study, library pedagogy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review