Cited by 22Library Science and Information LiteracyWeb and Library ServicesLibrary Science and Information

Quiet in the Library: An Evidence-Based Approach to Improving the Student Experience

Open access
McCaffrey, Ciara, Breen, Michelle·2016·portal: Libraries and the Academy

Abstract

This article deals with the management of noise in an academic library by outlining an\nevidence-based approach taken over seven years by the University of Limerick in the Republic of\nIreland. The objective of this study was to measure the impact on library users of noise management\ninterventions implemented from 2007 to 2014 through retrospective analysis of LibQUAL+®\nsurvey data. The data indicate that readers’ perceptions of the provision of quiet space in the\nlibrary greatly improved in that period. The study provides evidence showing the effectiveness of\ninterventions, such as the development of a noise policy, zoning, rearranging of furniture, removal\nof service points from reader spaces, and structural improvements. There is evidence to indicate\nthat the creation of a separate graduate reading room may be an effective noise management\nintervention not previously identified in the literature. Academic libraries struggling with noise\nproblems and those with low scores on the LibQUAL+® quiet space question may find some\nhelpful interventions that have an underlying evidence base to indicate their effectiveness when\ndealing with noise and the provision of quiet space.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This case study retrospectively examines four LibQUAL surveys at the University of Limerick from 2007 to 2014 to assess whether a seven-year noise-management program improved users’ perceptions of quiet space. It reports substantial gains on the quiet-space question, especially among graduate students, while noting that multiple simultaneous interventions make individual effects hard to isolate.

Key findings

  • The quiet-space adequacy mean rose from −1.2 in 2007 to −0.13 in 2014, an improvement of 1.07, compared with a 0.36 improvement across all 22 LibQUAL questions; this was about three times the overall gain and nearly double the next most-improved question (IC3, 0.64).
  • Graduate students showed the largest seven-year improvement on quiet space (2.03), followed by undergraduates (0.82) and faculty (0.52); in 2014, quiet space was no longer the lowest-scoring question, having been overtaken by group space (LP5) and inspiring space (LP1).
  • Free-text comments about noise fell from 35% of comments in 2007 to 8.6% in 2014, after being 46% in 2009 and 30.5% in 2012.
  • Group space was the only “library as place” question to decline, with an adequacy mean difference of −0.23 from 2007 to 2014, while quiet space improved by 1.07.

Methods

  • Retrospective longitudinal analysis of University of Limerick LibQUAL data from four survey administrations (2007, 2009, 2012, 2014), totaling 7,219 completed surveys; response rates rose from 9% in 2007 to 17% in 2014.
  • The study analyzed all 22 core LibQUAL questions and the three dimensions, focusing on LP2 (“Quiet space for individual work”), using the adequacy mean (perceived mean minus minimum mean) as the improvement metric.
  • Internal benchmarking across surveys was combined with external benchmarking against ARL North American and SCONUL U.K. consortium data, plus analysis of qualitative free-text comments mentioning noise or quiet.

Limitations

  • The paper states that because more than one intervention occurred between surveys, it cannot determine the effectiveness of each individual intervention.
  • The paper notes that the switch to LibQUAL Lite in 2012 reduced the number of respondents answering the quiet-space question, particularly affecting graduate and faculty responses, and that comparisons between two surveys should be treated cautiously.
  • The paper states that faculty and staff perceptions were not explored in depth because those groups use the library building less; evident from the text, the study is a single-institution retrospective case without a control group, and other concurrent quality actions and changing survey cohorts may confound the results.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/pla.2016.0052

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 11 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Much of the noise management literature consists of opinion-style articles.

    “Much of the literature on noise management consists of opinion-style articles, Jeffrey Gayton's 2008 piece being among those that lament the rise of social spaces at the expense of silence.4”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. Jeffrey T. Gayton, "Academic Libraries: 'Social or Communal?' The Nature and Future of Academic Libraries," Journal of Academic Librarianship 34, 1(2008): 60-66. source
  • Premisecitation

    The effectiveness of advice-based noise solutions such as zoning, policies, rearranging furniture, signage, and better space utilization remains unmeasured.

    “However, the effectiveness of these changes remains unmeasured.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] 7. Michael A. Crumpton, "Sounding Off about Noise," Community & Junior College Libraries 13, 4 (2007): 93-103. source

      In “And the Answer Is” (page unavailable), the paper recommends changes to layout, furniture, policies and signage. It does not report an effectiveness measurement for those recommendations, but it also does not state that their effectiveness remains unmeasured; the recommendations are supported, while that conclusion is not established by the cited text. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    None of the other library as place questions improved to the same degree as the quiet space question.

    “None of the other “library as place” questions improved to the same degree (see Table 3)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Overall LibQUAL scores at the University of Limerick consistently rose across the four survey iterations.

    “In the four iterations of the survey, the overall scores have consistently risen”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Undergraduates showed a 0.82 degree of improvement in quiet space perceptions.

    “Undergraduates showed a 0.82 degree of improvement”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims. 31
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Luyben noted that perceived noise is a better measure than actual noise because machines cannot measure disruptions such as fierce whispering, which may not be loud but can be very annoying.

    “While decibel tests are an exact measure of actual noise, Luyben notes that perceived noise is a better measuring stick than actual noise because machines cannot measure disruptions such as “fierce whispering,” which might not be loud but can be extremely annoying.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] 9. Paul D. Luyben, Leonard Cohen, Rebecca Conger, and Selby U. Gration, "Reducing Noise in a College Library," College and Research Libraries 42 (1981): 470-81. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Faculty reported the lowest degree of improvement, as they were less frequent users of the library space.

    “and, as less frequent users of the library space, faculty reported the lowest degree of improvement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 2007 at the University of Limerick, users' minimum standard for quiet space was 6.56 out of 9 and their perceived score was 5.36, giving an adequacy mean of -1.2.

    “At the University of Limerick in 2007, users scored their minimum standard for quiet space at 6.56 out of a total of 9 and their perceived score at 5.36, resulting in an adequacy mean of -1.2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The quiet space question's overall improvement over the four surveys was almost double that of any other question, making the improvement noteworthy compared with other questions.

    “The overall improvement in the quiet space question over the four iterations of the survey was almost double that of any other question, indicating that the improvement was indeed noteworthy when compared with the other questions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The other most-improved LibQUAL questions from 2007 to 2014 were IC3 with 0.64, IC1 with 0.5, and IC6 with 0.49.

    “The other most-improved questions from 2007 to 2014 included a 0.64 improvement in IC3, “the printed library materials I need for my work”; a 0.5 improvement in IC1, “making electronic resources accessible from my home or office”; and a 0.49 improvement in IC6, “easy to use access tools that allow me to find things on my own.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The University of Limerick study's findings differ from the University of Mississippi experience, with Limerick results reflecting the impact of library policy changes in many areas.

    “The findings of this University of Limerick study differ from the University of Mississippi experience, with the Limerick results reflecting the impact of library policy changes in many areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The new group zone immediately became a heavily used space.

    “the new group zone immediately became a heavily used space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The quiet space question is still among the lowest-scoring questions and still has a negative adequacy mean.

    “Frustratingly, the quiet space question is still among the lowest-scoring questions and still has a negative adequacy mean.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Undergraduate scores showed greater improvement than the previous survey, with a 0.42 degree of improvement.

    “Undergraduate scores showed greater improvement than the previous survey, with a 0.42 degree of improvement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 2012, the quiet space question again improved the most of the 22 questions but again scored the lowest.

    “while the quiet space question again improved the most of the 22 questions, it again scored the lowest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Analysis of comments supports the interpretation, with 8.6 percent of 2014 comments relating to noise compared with 35 percent in 2007.

    “Analysis of the comments supports this interpretation, with a mere 8.6 percent of the 2014 comments relating to noise, compared with 35 percent in 2007.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The level of improvement in quiet space was almost double that of the other most-improved LibQUAL questions and three times greater than the overall improvement in the period.

    “This study found that the level of improvement in quiet space was almost double that of the other most-improved LibQUAL questions and three times greater than the overall improvement in the period.”
    • Also stated in: § Where Do We Go from Here? · plain
      “After four iterations of LibQUAL and a seven-year-long program of noise management at the University of Limerick, the improvement in the quiet space question is almost double that of any other question.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Library staff had no doubt that zoning had the biggest impact on noise levels and complaints, and the frequency of dealing with offending students dropped significantly.

    “Library staff in the building, however, had no doubt that zoning had the biggest impact on noise levels and complaints, and the frequency of dealing with offending students dropped significantly.”
    • Also stated in: § 2012 to 2014: Zoning and the Graduate Reading Room · plain
      “zoning had the biggest impact on noise levels and complaints, and the frequency of dealing with offending students dropped significantly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In every year since 2007, LP2 was the lowest-scoring of the 22 questions in the SCONUL consortium results and had a negative adequacy gap for seven out of eight years.

    “In every year since 2007, LP2 has been the lowest scoring of the 22 questions in the SCONUL consortium results and has had a negative adequacy gap for seven out of eight of those years”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The greatest improvement in scores in 2014 came from graduate students, with adequacy mean improving from -1.62 in 2012 to -0.11 in 2014, a 1.51 improvement.

    “the greatest improvement in scores came from graduate students, where the adequacy mean went from -1.62 in 2012 to -0.11 in 2014, showing (by the University of Limerick's LibQUAL experience) a remarkable improvement of 1.51 between two surveys.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Noise is no longer the biggest issue for readers, although the noise problem is not entirely solved.

    “say that noise is no longer the biggest issue for readers, although we have not solved the noise problem entirely.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perceptions of quiet space in North American libraries that have run LibQUAL are not as low as in the United Kingdom, but LP2 in ARL consortium notebooks usually ranks among the five lowest-scoring questions.

    “Perceptions of quiet space in North American libraries that have run LibQUAL are not as low as in the United Kingdom; however, LP2 in the ARL consortium notebooks usually ranks in the five lowest-scoring questions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perceptions sharply decreased among graduate students in 2012, who were deeply unhappy with noise regardless of structural changes.

    “perceptions sharply decreased among graduate students, who were clearly deeply unhappy with the noise in the library, regardless of the structural changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the 2007 survey, the quiet space question was the lowest-scoring of the 22 core questions, and 35 percent of the 546 free-text comments related to noise.

    “The quiet space question was the lowest scoring of the 22 core questions asked in the survey, and 35 percent of the 546 free-text comments related to noise.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The graduate reading room provided 120 study spaces solely for graduates and was one of the most naturally quiet spaces in the library.

    “It provided 120 study spaces solely for graduates and was one of the most naturally quiet spaces in the library.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 2014, only 8.6 percent of the 1,075 comments dealt with noise, compared with 30.5 percent in the previous year.

    “only 8.6 percent of the 1,075 comments dealt with noise, as compared with 30.5 percent in the previous year.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Glucksman Library's student-to-seat ratio is high compared with UK averages and all other Irish university libraries.

    “The student-to-seat ratio is high in comparison to U.K. averages and all other Irish university libraries.17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] 17. LibQUAL+®, ARL & Group Notebooks, accessed November 30, 2015, https://www. libqual.org/publications; SCONUL (Society of College, National and University Libraries), Library and Information Statistics Unit (LISU), "Annual Library Statistics 2013-2014," Loughborough University, Loughborough, U.K.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The quality action plans had an impact and readers' perceptions of the quality of library services improved.

    “indicating that the quality action plans have an impact and that readers' perceptions of the quality of library services have improved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Changes in overall LibQUAL scores reflect the effect of quality action plans rather than other factors.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A follow-up study by the same authors added another year of LibQUAL data and again found that adequacy gap scores did not seem to reflect fairly major changes.

    “A follow-up study by the same authors added new LibQUAL data for a further year and again found that adequacy gap scores seemed not to reflect fairly major changes.15”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] 15. Melissa Dennis, Judy Greenwood, and Alex Watson, "LibQUAL Revisited: Further Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Survey Results at the University of Mississippi," Journal of Academic Librarianship 39, 6 (2013): 512-16. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each year's LibQUAL sample at the University of Limerick was deemed representative of the user group populations, with overall response rates increasing from 9 percent in 2007 to 17 percent in 2014.

    “Each year, the sample size was deemed representative of the user group populations, with overall response rates increasing from 9 percent in 2007 to 17 percent in 2014.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Evidence-based studies that explore the effectiveness of noise interventions are rare because perceived noise is subjective and metrics for improvement are difficult to identify.

    “Evidence-based studies that explore the effectiveness of noise interventions are rare, due to the subjectivity of what is perceived as “noisy” and “quiet” and the difficulty in identifying metrics by which improvement can be measured.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Noise in the library is not a trivial matter; as Steven Bell says, noise makes the difference between an academic library that is avoided and one that is a prime campus destination.

    “Noise in the library is not a trivial matter; along with other quality of life factors, as Steven Bell says, “Noise makes the difference between an academic library that is avoided at all costs and one that is a prime campus destination.” 2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] 2. Steven J. Bell, "Stop Having Fun and Start Being Quiet: Noise Management in the Academic Library," Library Issues 28, 4 (2008), 1. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    A number of articles about LibQUAL in individual institutions mention the quiet space question as particularly low scoring.

    “A number of articles about LibQUAL in individual institutions mention the quiet space question as being particularly low scoring.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Bressler and Yelinek's review of increased noise in American academic libraries from 1980 to 2010 noted a lack of evidence-based studies on how to combat noise.

    “Darle Bressler and Kathryn Yelinek provide a comprehensive literature review on increased noise levels in American academic libraries, spanning 1980 to 2010. 3 The authors sought to identify best practices for noise management through their review but noted the dearth of evidence-based studies investigating means of combating the problem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] 3. Kathryn Yelinek and Darla Bressler, "The Perfect Storm: A Review of the Literature on Increased Noise Levels in Academic Libraries," College & Undergraduate Libraries 20, 1 (2013): 40-51. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Perceptions improved most among graduates over the seven-year period, suggesting the noise management program had the greatest impact on the graduate student experience, whether interventions targeted that group or the general population.

    “Perceptions improved most among graduates in the seven-year period, suggesting that the noise management program had the greatest impact on the graduate student experience, whether the interventions targeted that user group or the more general population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Library managers faced with a serious noise problem or low LibQUAL scores on quiet space may take heart from the University of Limerick experience.

    “A final inference of this paper is that library managers who find themselves faced with a serious noise problem or low LibQUAL scores on the quiet space question may take heart from the University of Limerick experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Analysis of the LibQUAL quiet space question shows the noise management program from 2007 to 2014 had an impact and readers' perceptions of quiet space greatly improved.

    “Analysis of the LibQUAL quiet space question shows that the noise management program adopted from 2007 to 2014 had an impact and that readers' perceptions of the provision of quiet space in the library greatly improved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    International data indicate that quiet space for individual work is becoming increasingly important to library users and that dissatisfaction with noise in many libraries is common.

    “International data indicate that quiet space for individual work is becoming increasingly important to library users and that dissatisfaction with noise in many libraries is common.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The 2014 survey cohort came from a population of new undergraduates who had not taken part in the survey in the early years, which may have affected results.

    “An element that may have been at play was that this survey cohort came from a population of new undergraduates who had not taken part in the survey in the early years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The reduction in sample size due to the transition to LibQUAL Lite needs to be taken into account when analyzing trends at an individual question level.

    “the reduction in sample size due to the transition to LibQUAL Lite needs to be taken into account when analyzing trends at an individual question level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The development of a clear and detailed noise policy, rearranging service spaces, and perhaps acknowledgement of the noise problem had the greatest overall impact on LibQUAL scores.

    “The development of a clear and detailed noise policy, rearranging service spaces, and perhaps the acknowledgement of the existence of a noise problem had the greatest overall impact on LibQUAL scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Comparisons between two surveys should be approached with caution, where unexpected or disappointing overall scores may be better explained by further analysis at a user group level.

    “Comparisons between two surveys should be approached with some caution, where unexpected or disappointing overall scores may be better explained by further analysis at a user group level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Analysis at a question level would be less useful for questions that are less specific or more subjective.

    “Analysis at a question level would be less useful for questions that are less specific or more subjective”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A library built for a population of 7,000 but catering for 13,000 may always have a challenge meeting users' expectations for quiet space.

    “A library built for a population of 7,000 but catering for 13,000 may always have a challenge with meeting the expectations of its users when it comes to quiet space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The refurbishment dealt with structural factors contributing to noise, while zoning dealt with behavioral issues.

    “While the refurbishment dealt with the structural factors that contributed to noise, zoning dealt with the behavioral issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
40 of 40
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Libraries have become noisier over the last two decades.

    “One consequence of such a transformation is that libraries appear to be growing noisier.”
    “as library spaces have become more social, less traditional, and consequently noisier.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Academic libraries need to provide collaborative and social spaces to meet diverse learning styles and changing pedagogies.

    “libraries increasingly need to provide collaborative and social spaces as part of their mandate to meet the needs of diverse learning styles and changing pedagogies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Students working on group presentations and assignments require spaces that facilitate active collaboration.

    “Students working on group presentations and assignments require spaces that facilitate active collaboration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Virtually all universities prioritize the student experience in their institutional strategic plans.

    “As virtually all universities prioritize the student experience in their institutional strategic plans”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Glucksman Library's high demand increases year on year.

    “In addition to the high demand, which increases year on year”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Changes in LibQUAL quiet space scores reflect the effect of the noise management interventions rather than other factors.

    “supporting the conclusion that the interventions focused on improving quiet space indeed had a targeted and specific impact.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Changes in overall LibQUAL scores reflect the effect of quality action plans rather than other factors.

    “indicating that the quality action plans have an impact and that readers' perceptions of the quality of library services have improved.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The library building's design caused noise to travel throughout, making effective zoning impossible before the atria were glazed.

    “In a building that amplified noise throughout”
    “prior to the glazing of the atria, it was impossible to zone areas effectively, since noise traveled almost everywhere.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No other major changes or factors outside the noise management program caused the observed improvements in LibQUAL quiet space scores.

    “Because more than one intervention was put in place between surveys, it was not possible to conclude the degree of effectiveness of each individual intervention.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The 2009 quiet-space score changes from −0.8 to −0.08

    Minor

    The discussion gives the 2009 adequacy mean as −0.08, but Table 2 gives −0.8. The stated improvement of 0.38 from 2009 to 2012 agrees with the table, indicating that −0.08 is erroneous.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]16. Michelle Breen and Ciara McCaffrey, "Dealing with the Noise Problem: Libraries Improving Their Scores on 'Quiet Space for Individual Work,'" presentation at 10th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, July 22-25, 2013, York, U.K.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCaffrey, C., & Breen, M.
Venue
portal: Libraries and the Academy
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2016
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
775-791
ISSN
1530-7131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2529064842
Cited by
22
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
30.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • portal Libraries and the Academy (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
student experience, academic libraries, library noise, library user behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-02.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-02.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review