Quiet in the Library: An Evidence-Based Approach to Improving the Student Experience
Open accessAbstract
This article deals with the management of noise in an academic library by outlining an\nevidence-based approach taken over seven years by the University of Limerick in the Republic of\nIreland. The objective of this study was to measure the impact on library users of noise management\ninterventions implemented from 2007 to 2014 through retrospective analysis of LibQUAL+®\nsurvey data. The data indicate that readers’ perceptions of the provision of quiet space in the\nlibrary greatly improved in that period. The study provides evidence showing the effectiveness of\ninterventions, such as the development of a noise policy, zoning, rearranging of furniture, removal\nof service points from reader spaces, and structural improvements. There is evidence to indicate\nthat the creation of a separate graduate reading room may be an effective noise management\nintervention not previously identified in the literature. Academic libraries struggling with noise\nproblems and those with low scores on the LibQUAL+® quiet space question may find some\nhelpful interventions that have an underlying evidence base to indicate their effectiveness when\ndealing with noise and the provision of quiet space.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This case study retrospectively examines four LibQUAL surveys at the University of Limerick from 2007 to 2014 to assess whether a seven-year noise-management program improved users’ perceptions of quiet space. It reports substantial gains on the quiet-space question, especially among graduate students, while noting that multiple simultaneous interventions make individual effects hard to isolate.
Key findings
- The quiet-space adequacy mean rose from −1.2 in 2007 to −0.13 in 2014, an improvement of 1.07, compared with a 0.36 improvement across all 22 LibQUAL questions; this was about three times the overall gain and nearly double the next most-improved question (IC3, 0.64).
- Graduate students showed the largest seven-year improvement on quiet space (2.03), followed by undergraduates (0.82) and faculty (0.52); in 2014, quiet space was no longer the lowest-scoring question, having been overtaken by group space (LP5) and inspiring space (LP1).
- Free-text comments about noise fell from 35% of comments in 2007 to 8.6% in 2014, after being 46% in 2009 and 30.5% in 2012.
- Group space was the only “library as place” question to decline, with an adequacy mean difference of −0.23 from 2007 to 2014, while quiet space improved by 1.07.
Methods
- Retrospective longitudinal analysis of University of Limerick LibQUAL data from four survey administrations (2007, 2009, 2012, 2014), totaling 7,219 completed surveys; response rates rose from 9% in 2007 to 17% in 2014.
- The study analyzed all 22 core LibQUAL questions and the three dimensions, focusing on LP2 (“Quiet space for individual work”), using the adequacy mean (perceived mean minus minimum mean) as the improvement metric.
- Internal benchmarking across surveys was combined with external benchmarking against ARL North American and SCONUL U.K. consortium data, plus analysis of qualitative free-text comments mentioning noise or quiet.
Limitations
- The paper states that because more than one intervention occurred between surveys, it cannot determine the effectiveness of each individual intervention.
- The paper notes that the switch to LibQUAL Lite in 2012 reduced the number of respondents answering the quiet-space question, particularly affecting graduate and faculty responses, and that comparisons between two surveys should be treated cautiously.
- The paper states that faculty and staff perceptions were not explored in depth because those groups use the library building less; evident from the text, the study is a single-institution retrospective case without a control group, and other concurrent quality actions and changing survey cohorts may confound the results.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
3 of 11 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Much of the noise management literature consists of opinion-style articles.
“Much of the literature on noise management consists of opinion-style articles, Jeffrey Gayton's 2008 piece being among those that lament the rise of social spaces at the expense of silence.4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] 4. Jeffrey T. Gayton, "Academic Libraries: 'Social or Communal?' The Nature and Future of Academic Libraries," Journal of Academic Librarianship 34, 1(2008): 60-66. source
- Premisecitation
The effectiveness of advice-based noise solutions such as zoning, policies, rearranging furniture, signage, and better space utilization remains unmeasured.
“However, the effectiveness of these changes remains unmeasured.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Michael A. Crumpton, "Sounding Off about Noise," Community & Junior College Libraries 13, 4 (2007): 93-103. source
In “And the Answer Is” (page unavailable), the paper recommends changes to layout, furniture, policies and signage. It does not report an effectiveness measurement for those recommendations, but it also does not state that their effectiveness remains unmeasured; the recommendations are supported, while that conclusion is not established by the cited text. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
None of the other library as place questions improved to the same degree as the quiet space question.
“None of the other “library as place” questions improved to the same degree (see Table 3)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall LibQUAL scores at the University of Limerick consistently rose across the four survey iterations.
“In the four iterations of the survey, the overall scores have consistently risen”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Undergraduates showed a 0.82 degree of improvement in quiet space perceptions.
“Undergraduates showed a 0.82 degree of improvement”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The improvement on the quiet space question was three times the overall improvement.
“The improvement on the quiet space question amounted to three times the overall improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Graduate students showed the greatest improvement in quiet space perceptions, with a 2.03 degree of improvement.
“Perceptions improved most among graduates, with a 2.03 degree of improvement”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Interventions to improve group space between 2007 and 2014 were few because the building lacked available space.
“Interventions to improve group space between 2007 and 2014 were few, due to a lack of available space in the building.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The overall LibQUAL adequacy mean for all 22 questions at the University of Limerick increased from 0.02 to 0.38 between 2007 and 2014, an improvement of 0.36.
“In the same period, the overall LibQUAL adequacy mean for all 22 questions increased from 0.02 to 0.38, showing an overall degree of improvement of 0.36 in the seven years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 2007 LibQUAL survey at the Glucksman Library identified noise as a critical issue for a majority of the 1,119 respondents.
“The results identified noise as a critical issue for a majority of the 1,119 respondents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The group space question, LP5, was the only library as place question for which the adequacy mean dropped.
“the group space question (LP5) was the only one for which the adequacy mean dropped.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The adequacy mean for the quiet space question at the University of Limerick improved from -1.2 to -0.13 between 2007 and 2014, an improvement of 1.07.
“the adequacy mean for the quiet space question went from -1.2 to -0.13, showing a degree of improvement of 1.07 from 2007 to 2014.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After each of the four LibQUAL surveys at the University of Limerick, quiet space scores improved.
“Each time, the scores on quiet space improved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall adequacy mean improved from 0.02 in 2007 to 0.19 in 2009, a 0.17 improvement.
“The overall adequacy mean went from 0.02 to 0.19, showing an overall degree of improvement of 0.17.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 2014, for the first time, the quiet space question no longer ranked as the lowest-scoring question, bucking the trend in Ireland and the United Kingdom.
“In 2014, for the first time, the quiet space question no longer ranked as the lowest-scoring question, bucking the trend in Ireland and the United Kingdom.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The degree of improvement in LP2 between 2012 and 2014 was 0.29.
“The degree of improvement in the LP2 score between 2012 and 2014 was 0.29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
46 percent of the 761 comments in the 2009 survey related to noise.
“46 percent of the 761 comments in the 2009 survey related to noise”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 2014, overall adequacy mean improved from 0.29 to 0.38, a 0.09 improvement.
“The adequacy mean for all questions went from 0.29 to 0.38, showing a degree of improvement of 0.09.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Centralizing all customer-facing service points removed staff-generated noise from reader spaces.
“However, one of the most welcome and noticeable outcomes was a removal from the reader spaces of staff-generated noise emanating from desk transactions, cash registers, staff phones, and customer interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The quiet space question improved the most of the 22 core questions in the 2009 survey.
“The quiet space question improved the most of the 22 core questions in the 2009 survey”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The quiet space question again scored the lowest of all questions in 2009.
“However, the quiet space question again scored the lowest of all the questions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
30.5 percent of the 1,075 comments in 2012 related to noise.
“Of the 1,075 comments, 30.5 percent related to noise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 2009, 237 graduates answered the quiet space question, compared with 63 out of 308 graduate respondents in 2012.
“A total of 237 graduates answered the quiet space question as part of the full survey in 2009, compared with 63 out of 308 graduate respondents who answered the quiet space question in 2012.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
LibQUAL scores showed overall improvement in all areas in 2009.
“The LibQUAL scores showed an overall improvement in all areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the first time in UL's LibQUAL history, LP2 no longer scored the lowest, overtaken by LP5 and LP1.
“For the first time in the University of Limerick's LibQUAL history, LP2 no longer scored the lowest, having been overtaken by the group space question LP5 and the inspiring space question LP1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Overall adequacy mean improved from 0.19 in 2009 to 0.29 in 2012, a 0.1 improvement.
“the overall adequacy mean went from 0.19 to 0.29, showing an overall degree of improvement of 0.1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Quiet space adequacy mean improved from -1.2 in 2007 to -0.8 in 2009, a 0.4 improvement.
“The adequacy mean for the quiet space question went from -1.2 in 2007 to -0.8 in 2009, showing a 0.4 degree of improvement”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Graduate students showed the most progress in quiet space perception between 2007 and 2009.
“with perception levels among graduate students showing the most progress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Graduate students' comments indicated overcrowding and noise remained among their biggest issues.
“the comments indicated that overcrowding and noise remained among their biggest issues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Quiet space adequacy mean improved by 0.38 between 2009 and 2012.
“The adequacy mean for the quiet space question went from -0.08 to -0.42, a degree of improvement of 0.38.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Graduate students ranked as the least satisfied user group in 2012.
“They ranked as the least satisfied user group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Glazing the atria and installing doors resulted in immediately noticeable quiet to library staff.
“the resulting quiet, together with the ability to close off areas and reading spaces, was immediately noticeable to library staff.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The degree of improvement among undergraduates was 0.13.
“The degree of improvement among undergraduates was 0.13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Desired scores for quiet space in both North American and UK LibQUAL data increased from 2007 to 2014.
“What is most notable in both the North American and U.K. LibQUAL data is that desired scores for quiet space have increased from 2007 to 2014”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The interventions focused on improving quiet space had a targeted and specific impact.
“supporting the conclusion that the interventions focused on improving quiet space indeed had a targeted and specific impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Changes in LibQUAL quiet space scores reflect the effect of the noise management interventions rather than other factors.
- Premisecitation
The LibQUAL quiet space question, LP2, is often the lowest-scoring question in the survey.
“The quiet space question (LP2) is frequently the lowest-scoring question in the LibQUAL survey.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] 1. LibQUAL+®, ARL [Association of Research Libraries] & Group Notebooks, accessed November 30, 2015, https://www.libqual.org/publications.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
International LibQUAL data from academic libraries in the United Kingdom and North America show that noise is among the biggest issues students have with library spaces and services.
“International LibQUAL data from academic libraries in the United Kingdom and North America indicate that, for a great many libraries, noise is one of the biggest issues students have with their library spaces and services.1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] 1. LibQUAL+®, ARL [Association of Research Libraries] & Group Notebooks, accessed November 30, 2015, https://www.libqual.org/publications.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Improving the provision of quiet space by itself did not greatly enhance scores of the other library as place questions.
“A further conclusion was that improving the provision of quiet space by itself did not greatly enhance scores of the other “library as place” questions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Changes in LibQUAL quiet space scores reflect the effect of the noise management interventions rather than other factors.
- Interpretationown data
The noise management program had the greatest impact on the graduate student experience, whether or not the interventions targeted that group.
“suggesting that the noise management program had the greatest impact on the graduate student experience, whether the interventions targeted that user group or not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Changes in LibQUAL quiet space scores reflect the effect of the noise management interventions rather than other factors.
- Premisereasoning
Few studies have taken a longitudinal approach to LibQUAL results.
“To date, however, few studies take a longitudinal approach to LibQUAL results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
International LibQUAL data indicate that the desire for quiet space is steadily growing.
“International data indicate that the desire for quiet space is steadily growing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] 1. LibQUAL+®, ARL [Association of Research Libraries] & Group Notebooks, accessed November 30, 2015, https://www.libqual.org/publications.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
What felt like an intractable problem in 2007 became a manageable one through the trial and error of a continuously evolving noise management program that began with simple and affordable improvements.
“What felt like an intractable problem in 2007 became a manageable one through the trial and error of a continuously evolving noise management program that began with simple and affordable improvements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
LibQUAL data provide encouraging evidence that the program has greatly improved the student experience at the University of Limerick Library.
“The LibQUAL data provide encouraging evidence that this program has indeed greatly improved the student experience at the University of Limerick Library.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The transition to LibQUAL Lite in 2012 meant not all respondents answered the quiet space question, reducing responses from each user group.
“this change meant that not all respondents answered the quiet space question, thus reducing the number of responses from each user group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Users were still unhappy with the provision of quiet space in the library in 2009.
“indicating that users were still unhappy with the provision of quiet space in the library.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Because more than one intervention was put in place between surveys, it was not possible to conclude the degree of effectiveness of each individual intervention.
“Because more than one intervention was put in place between surveys, it was not possible to conclude the degree of effectiveness of each individual intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The large-scale structural refurbishment had the greatest effect on undergraduates.
“The large-scale structural refurbishment had the greatest effect on undergraduates”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In Irish libraries, scores for the quiet space question are lower still.
“In Irish libraries, scores for the quiet space question are lower still.18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] 18. Ciara McCaffrey, "LibQUAL in Ireland: Performance Assessment and Service Improvement in Irish University Libraries," Journal of Academic Librarianship 39, 4 (2013): 347-50. source
- Interpretationown data
Users' perceptions of how well UK libraries provide quiet space are generally low.
“indicating that users' perceptions of how well U.K. libraries provide quiet space are generally low.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The long-term investment of resources and effort focused on quiet space had a measurable impact.
“This supports the conclusion that the long-term investment of resources and effort focused on this specific issue had a measurable impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The refurbishment alone seemed insufficient to deal with the noise problem.
“Somewhat disappointingly, the refurbishment alone seemed insufficient to deal with the noise problem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The cycle of measure, improve, and measure again using LibQUAL data has led to a program of interventions that has grown far beyond what was thought possible in 2007.
“The cycle of measure, improve, and measure again using the LibQUAL data has led to a program of interventions that has grown far beyond what was thought possible in 2007.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Graduate students emphatically welcomed the creation of the graduate reading room.
“This user group emphatically welcomed the creation of the graduate reading room.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Focusing on graduate students, particularly through a dedicated space, may be an effective noise management intervention not previously identified in the literature.
“This study suggests that focusing on this user group, particularly through the creation or improvement of a dedicated space for graduate students, may be an effective noise management intervention not previously identified in the literature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The creation of a graduate reading room and zoning had the greatest impact on graduate students.
“the creation of a graduate reading room and zoning had the greatest impact on graduate students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Demand for quiet space for individual study is intensifying.
“indicating that the demand for quiet space for individual study is intensifying”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The reduction in responses particularly affected graduate and faculty responses.
“This particularly affected graduate and faculty responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The University of Limerick data and international consortium data suggest that quiet space is becoming increasingly important for library users.
“The University of Limerick data and the international consortium data suggest that quiet space is becoming increasingly important for library users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
- May combine two claims. 31
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLuyben noted that perceived noise is a better measure than actual noise because machines cannot measure disruptions such as fierce whispering, which may not be loud but can be very annoying.
“While decibel tests are an exact measure of actual noise, Luyben notes that perceived noise is a better measuring stick than actual noise because machines cannot measure disruptions such as “fierce whispering,” which might not be loud but can be extremely annoying.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] 9. Paul D. Luyben, Leonard Cohen, Rebecca Conger, and Selby U. Gration, "Reducing Noise in a College Library," College and Research Libraries 42 (1981): 470-81. source
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFaculty reported the lowest degree of improvement, as they were less frequent users of the library space.
“and, as less frequent users of the library space, faculty reported the lowest degree of improvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 2007 at the University of Limerick, users' minimum standard for quiet space was 6.56 out of 9 and their perceived score was 5.36, giving an adequacy mean of -1.2.
“At the University of Limerick in 2007, users scored their minimum standard for quiet space at 6.56 out of a total of 9 and their perceived score at 5.36, resulting in an adequacy mean of -1.2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe quiet space question's overall improvement over the four surveys was almost double that of any other question, making the improvement noteworthy compared with other questions.
“The overall improvement in the quiet space question over the four iterations of the survey was almost double that of any other question, indicating that the improvement was indeed noteworthy when compared with the other questions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe other most-improved LibQUAL questions from 2007 to 2014 were IC3 with 0.64, IC1 with 0.5, and IC6 with 0.49.
“The other most-improved questions from 2007 to 2014 included a 0.64 improvement in IC3, “the printed library materials I need for my work”; a 0.5 improvement in IC1, “making electronic resources accessible from my home or office”; and a 0.49 improvement in IC6, “easy to use access tools that allow me to find things on my own.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe University of Limerick study's findings differ from the University of Mississippi experience, with Limerick results reflecting the impact of library policy changes in many areas.
“The findings of this University of Limerick study differ from the University of Mississippi experience, with the Limerick results reflecting the impact of library policy changes in many areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe new group zone immediately became a heavily used space.
“the new group zone immediately became a heavily used space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe quiet space question is still among the lowest-scoring questions and still has a negative adequacy mean.
“Frustratingly, the quiet space question is still among the lowest-scoring questions and still has a negative adequacy mean.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUndergraduate scores showed greater improvement than the previous survey, with a 0.42 degree of improvement.
“Undergraduate scores showed greater improvement than the previous survey, with a 0.42 degree of improvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 2012, the quiet space question again improved the most of the 22 questions but again scored the lowest.
“while the quiet space question again improved the most of the 22 questions, it again scored the lowest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAnalysis of comments supports the interpretation, with 8.6 percent of 2014 comments relating to noise compared with 35 percent in 2007.
“Analysis of the comments supports this interpretation, with a mere 8.6 percent of the 2014 comments relating to noise, compared with 35 percent in 2007.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe level of improvement in quiet space was almost double that of the other most-improved LibQUAL questions and three times greater than the overall improvement in the period.
“This study found that the level of improvement in quiet space was almost double that of the other most-improved LibQUAL questions and three times greater than the overall improvement in the period.”
- Also stated in: § Where Do We Go from Here? · plain
“After four iterations of LibQUAL and a seven-year-long program of noise management at the University of Limerick, the improvement in the quiet space question is almost double that of any other question.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Where Do We Go from Here? · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenLibrary staff had no doubt that zoning had the biggest impact on noise levels and complaints, and the frequency of dealing with offending students dropped significantly.
“Library staff in the building, however, had no doubt that zoning had the biggest impact on noise levels and complaints, and the frequency of dealing with offending students dropped significantly.”
- Also stated in: § 2012 to 2014: Zoning and the Graduate Reading Room · plain
“zoning had the biggest impact on noise levels and complaints, and the frequency of dealing with offending students dropped significantly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 2012 to 2014: Zoning and the Graduate Reading Room · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn every year since 2007, LP2 was the lowest-scoring of the 22 questions in the SCONUL consortium results and had a negative adequacy gap for seven out of eight years.
“In every year since 2007, LP2 has been the lowest scoring of the 22 questions in the SCONUL consortium results and has had a negative adequacy gap for seven out of eight of those years”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe greatest improvement in scores in 2014 came from graduate students, with adequacy mean improving from -1.62 in 2012 to -0.11 in 2014, a 1.51 improvement.
“the greatest improvement in scores came from graduate students, where the adequacy mean went from -1.62 in 2012 to -0.11 in 2014, showing (by the University of Limerick's LibQUAL experience) a remarkable improvement of 1.51 between two surveys.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNoise is no longer the biggest issue for readers, although the noise problem is not entirely solved.
“say that noise is no longer the biggest issue for readers, although we have not solved the noise problem entirely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPerceptions of quiet space in North American libraries that have run LibQUAL are not as low as in the United Kingdom, but LP2 in ARL consortium notebooks usually ranks among the five lowest-scoring questions.
“Perceptions of quiet space in North American libraries that have run LibQUAL are not as low as in the United Kingdom; however, LP2 in the ARL consortium notebooks usually ranks in the five lowest-scoring questions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPerceptions sharply decreased among graduate students in 2012, who were deeply unhappy with noise regardless of structural changes.
“perceptions sharply decreased among graduate students, who were clearly deeply unhappy with the noise in the library, regardless of the structural changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the 2007 survey, the quiet space question was the lowest-scoring of the 22 core questions, and 35 percent of the 546 free-text comments related to noise.
“The quiet space question was the lowest scoring of the 22 core questions asked in the survey, and 35 percent of the 546 free-text comments related to noise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe graduate reading room provided 120 study spaces solely for graduates and was one of the most naturally quiet spaces in the library.
“It provided 120 study spaces solely for graduates and was one of the most naturally quiet spaces in the library.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 2014, only 8.6 percent of the 1,075 comments dealt with noise, compared with 30.5 percent in the previous year.
“only 8.6 percent of the 1,075 comments dealt with noise, as compared with 30.5 percent in the previous year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Glucksman Library's student-to-seat ratio is high compared with UK averages and all other Irish university libraries.
“The student-to-seat ratio is high in comparison to U.K. averages and all other Irish university libraries.17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] 17. LibQUAL+®, ARL & Group Notebooks, accessed November 30, 2015, https://www. libqual.org/publications; SCONUL (Society of College, National and University Libraries), Library and Information Statistics Unit (LISU), "Annual Library Statistics 2013-2014," Loughborough University, Loughborough, U.K.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe quality action plans had an impact and readers' perceptions of the quality of library services improved.
“indicating that the quality action plans have an impact and that readers' perceptions of the quality of library services have improved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Changes in overall LibQUAL scores reflect the effect of quality action plans rather than other factors.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA follow-up study by the same authors added another year of LibQUAL data and again found that adequacy gap scores did not seem to reflect fairly major changes.
“A follow-up study by the same authors added new LibQUAL data for a further year and again found that adequacy gap scores seemed not to reflect fairly major changes.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] 15. Melissa Dennis, Judy Greenwood, and Alex Watson, "LibQUAL Revisited: Further Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Survey Results at the University of Mississippi," Journal of Academic Librarianship 39, 6 (2013): 512-16. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEach year's LibQUAL sample at the University of Limerick was deemed representative of the user group populations, with overall response rates increasing from 9 percent in 2007 to 17 percent in 2014.
“Each year, the sample size was deemed representative of the user group populations, with overall response rates increasing from 9 percent in 2007 to 17 percent in 2014.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningEvidence-based studies that explore the effectiveness of noise interventions are rare because perceived noise is subjective and metrics for improvement are difficult to identify.
“Evidence-based studies that explore the effectiveness of noise interventions are rare, due to the subjectivity of what is perceived as “noisy” and “quiet” and the difficulty in identifying metrics by which improvement can be measured.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNoise in the library is not a trivial matter; as Steven Bell says, noise makes the difference between an academic library that is avoided and one that is a prime campus destination.
“Noise in the library is not a trivial matter; along with other quality of life factors, as Steven Bell says, “Noise makes the difference between an academic library that is avoided at all costs and one that is a prime campus destination.” 2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] 2. Steven J. Bell, "Stop Having Fun and Start Being Quiet: Noise Management in the Academic Library," Library Issues 28, 4 (2008), 1. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenA number of articles about LibQUAL in individual institutions mention the quiet space question as particularly low scoring.
“A number of articles about LibQUAL in individual institutions mention the quiet space question as being particularly low scoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationBressler and Yelinek's review of increased noise in American academic libraries from 1980 to 2010 noted a lack of evidence-based studies on how to combat noise.
“Darle Bressler and Kathryn Yelinek provide a comprehensive literature review on increased noise levels in American academic libraries, spanning 1980 to 2010. 3 The authors sought to identify best practices for noise management through their review but noted the dearth of evidence-based studies investigating means of combating the problem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] 3. Kathryn Yelinek and Darla Bressler, "The Perfect Storm: A Review of the Literature on Increased Noise Levels in Academic Libraries," College & Undergraduate Libraries 20, 1 (2013): 40-51. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPerceptions improved most among graduates over the seven-year period, suggesting the noise management program had the greatest impact on the graduate student experience, whether interventions targeted that group or the general population.
“Perceptions improved most among graduates in the seven-year period, suggesting that the noise management program had the greatest impact on the graduate student experience, whether the interventions targeted that user group or the more general population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningLibrary managers faced with a serious noise problem or low LibQUAL scores on quiet space may take heart from the University of Limerick experience.
“A final inference of this paper is that library managers who find themselves faced with a serious noise problem or low LibQUAL scores on the quiet space question may take heart from the University of Limerick experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAnalysis of the LibQUAL quiet space question shows the noise management program from 2007 to 2014 had an impact and readers' perceptions of quiet space greatly improved.
“Analysis of the LibQUAL quiet space question shows that the noise management program adopted from 2007 to 2014 had an impact and that readers' perceptions of the provision of quiet space in the library greatly improved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenInternational data indicate that quiet space for individual work is becoming increasingly important to library users and that dissatisfaction with noise in many libraries is common.
“International data indicate that quiet space for individual work is becoming increasingly important to library users and that dissatisfaction with noise in many libraries is common.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe 2014 survey cohort came from a population of new undergraduates who had not taken part in the survey in the early years, which may have affected results.
“An element that may have been at play was that this survey cohort came from a population of new undergraduates who had not taken part in the survey in the early years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe reduction in sample size due to the transition to LibQUAL Lite needs to be taken into account when analyzing trends at an individual question level.
“the reduction in sample size due to the transition to LibQUAL Lite needs to be taken into account when analyzing trends at an individual question level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe development of a clear and detailed noise policy, rearranging service spaces, and perhaps acknowledgement of the noise problem had the greatest overall impact on LibQUAL scores.
“The development of a clear and detailed noise policy, rearranging service spaces, and perhaps the acknowledgement of the existence of a noise problem had the greatest overall impact on LibQUAL scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenComparisons between two surveys should be approached with caution, where unexpected or disappointing overall scores may be better explained by further analysis at a user group level.
“Comparisons between two surveys should be approached with some caution, where unexpected or disappointing overall scores may be better explained by further analysis at a user group level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAnalysis at a question level would be less useful for questions that are less specific or more subjective.
“Analysis at a question level would be less useful for questions that are less specific or more subjective”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA library built for a population of 7,000 but catering for 13,000 may always have a challenge meeting users' expectations for quiet space.
“A library built for a population of 7,000 but catering for 13,000 may always have a challenge with meeting the expectations of its users when it comes to quiet space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe refurbishment dealt with structural factors contributing to noise, while zoning dealt with behavioral issues.
“While the refurbishment dealt with the structural factors that contributed to noise, zoning dealt with the behavioral issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Libraries have become noisier over the last two decades.
“One consequence of such a transformation is that libraries appear to be growing noisier.”
“as library spaces have become more social, less traditional, and consequently noisier.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Academic libraries need to provide collaborative and social spaces to meet diverse learning styles and changing pedagogies.
“libraries increasingly need to provide collaborative and social spaces as part of their mandate to meet the needs of diverse learning styles and changing pedagogies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students working on group presentations and assignments require spaces that facilitate active collaboration.
“Students working on group presentations and assignments require spaces that facilitate active collaboration.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Virtually all universities prioritize the student experience in their institutional strategic plans.
“As virtually all universities prioritize the student experience in their institutional strategic plans”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Glucksman Library's high demand increases year on year.
“In addition to the high demand, which increases year on year”
The paper relies on this without support.
Changes in LibQUAL quiet space scores reflect the effect of the noise management interventions rather than other factors.
“supporting the conclusion that the interventions focused on improving quiet space indeed had a targeted and specific impact.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Changes in overall LibQUAL scores reflect the effect of quality action plans rather than other factors.
“indicating that the quality action plans have an impact and that readers' perceptions of the quality of library services have improved.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The library building's design caused noise to travel throughout, making effective zoning impossible before the atria were glazed.
“In a building that amplified noise throughout”
“prior to the glazing of the atria, it was impossible to zone areas effectively, since noise traveled almost everywhere.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No other major changes or factors outside the noise management program caused the observed improvements in LibQUAL quiet space scores.
“Because more than one intervention was put in place between surveys, it was not possible to conclude the degree of effectiveness of each individual intervention.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature on noise management in libraries has grown in recent years but mostly consists of opinion-style articles, with only a small number of articles that include evidence-based research.
“the literature on noise management in libraries has grown in recent years but mostly consists of opinion-style articles with only a small number of articles that include evidence based research (McCaffrey & Breen, 2016)”
From Seven Years of Noise Reduction Strategies in an Academic Library Improve Students’ Perceptions of Quiet Space, Especially Among Graduate Students (2019) · cites this paper as McCaffrey & Breen, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The 2009 quiet-space score changes from −0.8 to −0.08
MinorThe discussion gives the 2009 adequacy mean as −0.08, but Table 2 gives −0.8. The stated improvement of 0.38 from 2009 to 2012 agrees with the table, indicating that −0.08 is erroneous.
“The adequacy mean for the quiet space question went from -0.08 to -0.42, a degree of improvement of 0.38.”
“All users 2009 -0.8 1,581 0.4 All users 2012 -0.42 511 0.38”
Cites
Academic Libraries: “Social” or “Communal?” The Nature and Future of Academic Libraries
Gayton, J. T. (2008) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.011 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Jankowska, M. A., Hertel, K., & Young, N. J. (2006) · portal: Libraries and the Academy · doi:10.1353/pla.2006.0005 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Greenwood, J. T., Watson, A. P., & Dennis, M. (2011) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.04.005 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Thompson, B., Kyrillidou, M., & Cook, C. (2009) · Performance Measurement and Metrics · doi:10.1108/14678040910949657 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
LibQUAL in Ireland: Performance Assessment and Service Improvement in Irish University Libraries
McCaffrey, C. (2013) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.036 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Perfect Storm: A Review of the Literature on Increased Noise Levels in Academic Libraries
Yelinek, K., & Bressler, D. (2013) · College & Undergraduate Libraries · doi:10.1080/10691316.2013.761095 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A Decade of Assessment at a Research-Extensive University Library Using LibQUAL+®
Cook, C., & Maciel, M. (2010) · Research Library Issues · doi:10.29242/rli.271.2 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Noise Management in Twenty-First Century Libraries: Case Studies of Four U.S. Academic Institutions
Franks, J. E., & Asher, D. C. (2014) · New Review of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1080/13614533.2014.891528 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Dennis, M., Greenwood, J., & Watson, A. (2013) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.009 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Stop Having Fun and Start Being Quiet: Noise Management in an Academic Library
bell, S. (2008) · mountainside publishing · doi:10.17613/18tf1-9tt97 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Reducing Noise in a College Library
Luyben, P. D., Cohen, L., Conger, R., & Gration, S. U. (1981) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl_42_05_470 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Crumpton, M. A. (2007) · Community & Junior College Libraries · doi:10.1300/j107v13n04_11 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Rising Tides: Faculty Expectations of Library Websites
Nicol, E. C., & O'English, M. (2012) · portal: Libraries and the Academy · doi:10.1353/pla.2012.0038 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Using Lighting Levels to Control Sound Levels in a College Library
Hronek, B. (1997) · College & Undergraduate Libraries · doi:10.1300/j106v04n02_04 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Brooks, M. (2014) · The New Scientist · doi:10.1016/s0262-4079(14)61166-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Sounds and the Furies: Managing an Active Library in a New Generation of Learners
Bernstein, A. (2008) · Georgia Library Quarterly · doi:10.62915/2157-0396.1140 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pacheco, T. (2007) · Georgia Library Quarterly · doi:10.62915/2157-0396.1117 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [16]16. Michelle Breen and Ciara McCaffrey, "Dealing with the Noise Problem: Libraries Improving Their Scores on 'Quiet Space for Individual Work,'" presentation at 10th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, July 22-25, 2013, York, U.K.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Library as place: Understanding contradicting user expectations
Garnar, M., & Tonyan, J. (2021) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102391 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kang, Q., Song, Z., Lu, J., Shi, T., & Yang, J. (2022) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102525 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Transforming the University Library One Step at a Time: A Ten Year LibQUAL + Review
McCaffrey, C. (2019) · New Review of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1080/13614533.2018.1511438 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“…implemented from 2007 to 2014 and found that reader perceptions of the provision of quiet space greatly improved in the period and that continuous effort focused on the specific issue of noise management had a measurable impact on user perceptions as measured by LibQUALþ (McCaffrey & Breen, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationVaidya, P., Malik, B. A., & Ali, P. M. N. (2021) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006211042928 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Users’ viewpoints/judgements/perceptions or their open-comments recorded through LibQUAL+ tool were explored to determine the service quality of libraries (Cabrerizo et al., 2017; De Jager, 2015; Guder, 2017; Kumar and Mahajan, 2019b; Luther, 2015; McCaffrey and Breen, 2016; Manuela La Fata and Lupo, 2017; Moore, 2017…”
MethodResultInfluentialUniversity Students’ Changing Library Needs and Use: A Comparison of 2016 and 2018 Student Surveys
Scoulas, J. M., & Groote, S. L. D. (2020) · Evidence Based Library and Information Practice · doi:10.18438/eblip29621 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…using LibQUAL+ explored how users’ perceptions of library services and resources changed over time and how the academic libraries implemented changes in response to the survey results (Dennis et al., 2013; Greenwood et al., 2011; McCaffrey, 2019; McCaffrey & Breen, 2016; Taylor & Heath, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialStudent Use of the Information Commons: An Exploration through Mixed Methods
Archambault, S. G., & Justice, A. (2017) · Evidence Based Library and Information Practice · doi:10.18438/b8vd45 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…but what constitutes excess or distracting noise appears to be contextual (Cowan, 2012; Crook & Mitchell, 2012; Faletar Tanackovic, Lacović, & Gašo, 2014; Khoo, Rozaklis, Hall, & Kusunoki, 2017; McCaffrey & Breen, 2016; Newcomer, Lindahl, & Harriman, 2016; Regalado & Smale, 2015; Suarez, 2007).”
Effects of digital devices on noise levels in an academic library
Chaputula, A. H. (2021) · Digital Library Perspectives · doi:10.1108/dlp-08-2020-0081 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Rabelo, C. A., Teixeira, J., & Mendes, G. H. D. S. (2024) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102878 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Finding the sonic sweet spot: Implementing a noise management program in a library learning commons
Pierard, C., & Baca, O. (2019) · Journal of Access Services · doi:10.1080/15367967.2019.1649985 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“McCaffrey and Breen (2016) noted that much of the literature on library noise levels is opinion-based, identifying a need for more evidence-based studies.”
BackgroundMining reference chat transcripts to analyze noise complaints
Vance, J. M. (2018) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/rsr-11-2017-0042 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Anderson, A., & Ivacic-Ramljak, T. (2021) · Journal of Health Information and Libraries Australasia · doi:10.55999/johila.v2i3.83 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Crítica y ratificación del modelo del tercer lugar para las bibliotecas
Gallo-León, J.-P. (2019) · Anuario ThinkEPI · doi:10.3145/thinkepi.2019.e13b01 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Expectations of the acoustic environment in the national library of technology – Case study
Brothánek, M., Jandák, V., & Jiříček, O. (2020) · Applied Acoustics · doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107507 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Learning Commons en bibliotecas universitarias
Martínez, L. G., & Peña, F. D. J. J. (2019) · Información cultura y sociedad · doi:10.34096/ics.i41.6621 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sullo, E. (2019) · Evidence Based Library and Information Practice · doi:10.18438/eblip29637 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Topic Modeling of ADHD Discourse on Reading Challenges: Cognitive Differences and Systemic Factors
Thach, H., & Ridenour, L. (2025) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330251395890 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Traditionally “ quiet ” spaces such as academic libraries have fl uctuating noise that disrupts task persistence (McCaffrey & Breen, 2016).”
Modica, M., Grozeva, I., Cetani, D., et al. (2025) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113810 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Papadakis, N. M., & Stavroulakis, G. Ε. (2024) · IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment (MetroLivEnv) · doi:10.1109/metrolivenv60384.2024.10615396 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Schuba, A., Swackhamer, A., & White, G. W. (2026) · Performance Measurement and Metrics · doi:10.1108/pmm-06-2025-0034
College Teachers’ Involvement in the Promotion of Information Literacy
Lowaton, D. L. (2023) · British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies · doi:10.37745/bjmas.2022.0372
DuBroy, M. (2019) · Evidence Based Library and Information Practice · doi:10.18438/eblip29625
“Yet, new types of collaborative, technology-enhanced learning spaces can often make libraries seem noisier (McCaffrey & Breen, 2016; Yelinek & Bressler, 2013).”
BackgroundAn Integrated User-centered Approach to Architectural Design for Library Study Spaces
Jureidini, J. (2017) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r39k46663
- Authors
- McCaffrey, C., & Breen, M.
- Venue
- portal: Libraries and the Academy
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 775-791
- ISSN
- 1530-7131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2529064842
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 30.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- portal Libraries and the Academy (publishedVersion)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- student experience, academic libraries, library noise, library user behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-02.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-02.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review