Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ambivalent citizenship: political cynicism, community engagement and belonging among youth in Brazil

Mandache, Luminiţa-Anda·2024·Citizenship Studies

Abstract

This article interrogates the role of urban peripheries in creating political imaginaries and understandings of citizenship among children and grandchildren of insurgent citizens in urban Northeast Brazil. The analysis draws on data collected through 10 ethnographically informed focus groups with youth between 18 and 35. The article argues that, contrary to beliefs that young people are apathetic about politics or enthusiastic to engage in progressive social movements, youth have an ambivalent relationship with the state, informed by everyday encounters with precarious infrastructure, awareness of previous forms of collective action that determines their civic engagement, and feelings of belonging to home communities. The article suggests revisiting the concept of insurgent citizenship considering new socio-political changes that framed the lives of young people living in urban peripheries in the past two decades in Brazil and proposes ambivalence as a productive theoretical angle to make sense of ruptures and discontinuities in political practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13621025.2024.2418942

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Davis, D.-A., and C. Craven. 2016. Feminist Ethnography: Thinking Through Methodologies, Challenges and Possibilities. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  2. Freire, P. 1973/2017. The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury.
  3. Kopper, M. 2024. “The Right to Information: Bottom-Up Bureaucracies and Data Infrastructures at Brazil’s Urban Margins.” Journal of Anthropological Research. (forthcoming).
  4. Mandache, L.-A. 2023. “NGOs as ‘Necessary Evils’: Challenges of Doing Good in Urban Northeast Brazil.” In Ethnographic Insights on Latin America and the Caribbean, edited by M. Medeiros and J. Guzman, 241–251. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  5. Mandache, L.-A., and M. Kopper. 2024. “Beyond Liberal Insurgency: New Modulations of Citizenship at Brazil’s Urban Margins.” Journal of Anthropological Research. (forthcoming).
  6. Mühlfried, F. 2021. “The Spectrum of Mistrust.” Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 146: 201–218.
  7. Muylaert, A. 2015. The Second Mother. Drama.
  8. Trece, J., and C. Considera. 2023. Breve Retrato Econômico Da Região Nordeste. FGV IBRE. https://portalibre.fgv.br/system/files/2023-04/td8-breve-retrato-economico-da-regiao-nordeste.pdf.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mandache, L.-A.
Affiliations
Center for Ethics and Poverty Research, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
Venue
Citizenship Studies
Published
2024-07-03
Volume
28
Issue
4-5
Pages
498-515
ISSN
  • 1362-1025
  • 1469-3593
Cited by
6
References
37
Language
en
Funders
Austrian Science Fund (M3045)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.