Cited by 116Middle East Politics and SocietyMiddle East and Rwanda ConflictsPolitical Conflict and Governance

Popular mobilization in Syria: Opportunity and threat, and the social networks of the early risers

Leenders, Reinoud, Heydemann, Steven·2012·Mediterranean Politics

Abstract

This paper explores the dynamics and underlying conditions of the first few months of the uprising in Syria, from mid-March 2011 until the summer of that year. Together with the contributions from Dalmasso and Kandil, it exploits the opportunity created by the Arab uprisings to shed new light on patterns of social mobilization and collective action that research programmes focusing on authoritarian resilience had tended to overlook. Specifically, it presents an analysis that critically and loosely borrows from, communicates with and hopes to make a modest contribution to social movement theory (SMT). While threat and opportunity are necessary elements for popular mobilization, they are not sufficient. Both ‘threat’ and ‘opportunity’ therefore need to be contextualized within the specific social and political environment, real or perceived, of the ‘early risers’ in Syria, in order to appreciate their local significance. The article further argues that protestors, when under threat and faced with the opportunity, collectively rose up by capitalizing on their dense social networks. Strong clan-based or tribal social structures, circular labour migration, cross-border linkages and proliferating practices denoted as ‘criminal’ variably played a key role in cementing these social networks. It is also contended that these networks' ability easily to dissolve into one another due to their high degree of interconnectedness was instrumental in collective mobilization and their ability to pose a strong and enduring challenge to the regime.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13629395.2012.694041

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative studies indicate that villages, towns, or cities without ties to dense regime-based patron-client networks before the uprising were very likely to experience violence in the early phase of the civil war.

    “Detailed qualitative studies of different Syrian localities since early 2011 strongly indicate that villages, towns, or cities without ties to dense regime-based patron-client networks before the uprising have indeed been very likely to experience violence in the early phase of the civil war.”
  • Areas with weak ties to patron-client networks faced an increased risk of violence during the civil war.

    “Those areas with weak ties to these networks faced an increased risk of violence during the civil war”
  • Areas with strong ties to patron-client networks remained calm during the civil war.

    “those areas with strong ties have remained calm”
  • The selective redistribution of scarce resources took place in areas where the regime had strong clientelist networks.

    “Taken together, there is ample qualitative evidence supporting the claim that the selective redistribution of scarce resources took place in areas where the regime had strong clientelist networks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leenders, R., & Heydemann, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Leenders, Reinoud
Venue
Mediterranean Politics
Published
2012-07
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
139-159
ISSN
  • 1362-9395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9418
OpenAlex
W2075800063
Cited by
116
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
30.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mediterranean Politics (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
Syrian uprising, mass mobilization, social networks, collective action, social movement theory, authoritarian resilience, labor migration, cross-border linkages, criminal networks, Arab Spring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review