Cited by 35Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic Performance and AnalysisStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

GROUND MOTION DOMINANT FREQUENCY EFFECT ON THE DESIGN OF MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS

LI∗, CHUNXIANG, LIU†, YANXIA·2004·Journal of Earthquake Engineering

Abstract

Utilising the Kanai-Tajimi and Clough-Penzien spectrums and the pseudo-excitation algorithm in the frequency domain, parametric study is performed to examine the effect of the dominant frequency of ground motion on the optimum parameters and effective-ness of multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD) with identical stiffness and damping coefficient but with unequal mass. The examination of the optimum parameters is con-ducted through the minimisation of the minimum values of the maximum displacement and acceleration dynamic magnification factors of the structure with the MTMD. The optimum parameters of the MTMD include the optimum frequency spacing reflecting the robustness, the average damping ratio and the tuning frequency ratio. Minimisation of the minimum values of the maximum displacement and acceleration dynamic mag-nification factors, nondimensionalised respectively by the maximum displacement and acceleration dynamic magnification factors of the structure without the MTMD, is used to measure the effectiveness of the MTMD. The results indicate that in the two cases where both the total mass ratio is below 0.02 and the total mass ratio is above 0.02, but the dominant frequency ratio of ground motion is below unity (including unity), the earthquake ground motion can be modelled by a white noise. It is worth noting, however, that for the total mass ratio above 0.02, the Kanai-Tajimi Spectrum or Clough-Penzien spectrum needs to be employed to design the MTMD for seismic structures in situations where the dominant frequency ratio of ground motion is beyond unity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13632460409350482

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Earthquake ground motion can be represented by white noise for the optimum design of MTMD when the total mass ratio is lower than 0.02, or when the total mass ratio is over 0.02 but the dominant frequency of the earthquake is above the frequency of the structure.

    “According to Li and Liu [154], the earthquake ground motion can be represented by a white noise for the optimum design of MTMD; where both the total mass ratio is lower than 0.02 and the total mass ratio is over 0.02 but the dominant frequency of earth quake is above the frequency of structure.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LI∗, C., & LIU†, Y.
Affiliations
Tongji University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Published
2004-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
89-105
ISSN
  • 1363-2469 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-808X
OpenAlex
W2052445654
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Earthquake Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Keywords
multiple tuned mass dampers, seismic isolation, Kanai-Tajimi spectrum, dynamic magnification factor, damping ratio, mass ratio, earthquake response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review