Criminological perspectives on school exclusion and youth offending
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between school exclusion and youth crime and considers what criminological research can add to our understanding. The article first explores the history of the ways in which the criminological implications of school exclusion have been conceptualised, including the link between exclusion and young people’s offending, and the so-called ‘school-to-prison pipeline’. There is a long history of work in the UK and the US that explores how processes of school exclusion contribute to youth crime, the trajectory from the label of ‘troublemaker’ to more serious deviance, and how disciplinary polices can themselves lead to criminalisation. As we show, the relationship is complex and establishing causality is difficult. We then consider more recent work on how school exclusion contributes to the vulnerability and exploitation of marginalised young people. Finally, we argue for understanding young people’s lives, their educational experiences, and their involvement in offending, holistically and ‘in the round’, taking account of all their relationships and activities and employing contextual approaches to addressing these problems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
School exclusion is associated with adverse outcomes across behavioural, academic, and social domains.
“The empirical literature has consistently shown that exclusion from school is associated with adverse outcomes across behavioural, academic, and social domains.”
From School‐Based Interventions for Reducing Disciplinary School Exclusion. An Updated Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Arnez and Condry 2021
Excluded pupils appear at greater risk of engaging in delinquent or criminal activity.
“Scholars such as Arnez and Condry (2021) have drawn attention to the ‘school‐to‐prison pipeline’, whereby excluded pupils appear at greater risk of engaging in delinquent or criminal activity, a trajectory also noted by McAra and McVie (2010).”
From School‐Based Interventions for Reducing Disciplinary School Exclusion. An Updated Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Arnez and Condry 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
School‐Based Interventions for Reducing Disciplinary School Exclusion. An Updated Systematic Review
Valdebenito, S., Gaffney, H., Arosemena‐Burbano, M. J., Hitchcock, S., Jolliffe, D., & Sutherland, A. (2025) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.70063 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Valdebenito, S., Gaffney, H., & Jolliffe, D. (2023) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.1002/cl2.1344 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Arnez, J., & Condry, R.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Criminology, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Condry, Rachel
- Venue
- Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-01-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-100
- ISSN
- 1363-2752 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2692
- OpenAlex
- W3153806675
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/S015744/1, ES/V011766/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Keywords
- school exclusion, juvenile delinquency, school-to-prison pipeline, student discipline, criminalization, marginalized youth, youth vulnerability, educational experience, contextual approach, criminological theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review