Cited by 2Education Discipline and InequalityBehavioral and Psychological StudiesBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

PROTOCOL: School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: An updated systematic review

Open access
Valdebenito, Sara, Gaffney, Hannah, Jolliffe, Darrick·2023·Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World

Abstract

The primary goal of the present mixed methods review is to systematically examine the available evidence for the effectiveness of different types of school-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion. Quantitative evidence will help to understand the overall size of the impact, as well as the factors that better explain it. Qualitative evidence will help to better understand how these programmes may work, and what factors aid or hinder implementation and success. The research questions underlying the quantitative review are as follows: Do school-based programmes reduce the use of exclusionary sanctions in schools? Are some school-based approaches more effective than others in reducing exclusionary sanctions? Do participants’ characteristics (e.g., age, sex, or ethnicity) affect the impact of school-based programmes on exclusionary sanctions in schools? Do characteristics of the interventions, implementation, and methodology affect the impact of school-based programmes on exclusionary sanctions in schools? Do school-based programmes have an impact on reducing the involvement of children and young people in crime and violence? Do participants’ characteristics (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity) affect the impact of school-based programmes on crime and violence? If sufficient data are available, we will compare different approaches (e.g., school-wide management, classroom management, restorative justice, cognitive-behavioural interventions) and identify those that could potentially demonstrate larger effects. We will also (potentially) run analysis controlling for characteristics of participants (e.g., age, ethnicity, level of risk); interventions (e.g., theoretical bases, components); implementation (e.g., facilitators’ training, doses, quality); and methodology (e.g., research design). The research questions underlying the qualitative review are defined as follows: What are the barriers and facilitators to implementation of interventions to reduce school exclusions? What are the barriers and facilitators to implementation of interventions to reduce the involvement of children and young people in crime and violence?

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cl2.1344

Cites

51 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Cochrane library Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). (2017). Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews 1. Risk of bias for studies with a separate control group. epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
  2. Draa, V. A. B. (2005). School uniforms in urban public high schools [Doctoral dissertation]. Youngstown State University. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED497409&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  3. Gouge, W. E. (2011). A comparison research study on the use of school uniforms and graduation, attendance, and suspension rates in East Tennessee [Doctoral dissertation]. Liberty University. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1471&context=doctoral
  4. Johnson, W. S. (2010). Analyses of the impact of school uniforms on violence in North Carolina public high schools [Doctoral dissertation]. East Carolina University. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED518842&site=ehost-live&scope=site http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3419127
  5. Liu, J. C. (2013). The suspension spike: Changing the discipline culture in NYC's middle schools. New York City Comptroller's Office (pp. 1– 65).
  6. Noyes, J., Booth, A., Cargo, M., Flemming, K., Harden, A., Harris, J., Garside, R., Hannes, K., Pantoja, T., & Thomas, J. (2022). Qualitative evidence. In J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, & V. A. Welch (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane. https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
  7. Raush, M. K., & Skiba, R. (2004). Unplanned outcomes: Suspensions and expulsions in indiana. Education Policy Briefs, 2(2), 1– 8.
  8. Samuels, K. S., & Bishop, H. R. W. B. (2003). The relationship of school uniforms to students’ achievement, attendance, discipline referrals and perceptions: An analysis of one urban school district [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Alabama at Birmingham. http://search.proquest.com/docview/305335354?accountid=9851 http://tf5lu9ym5n.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+A%26I&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertatio
  9. Shimizu, B., & Peterson, B. (2000). A study to determine what impact, if any, the implementation of a mandatory uniform dress policy has had on improving student behavior among ninth‐grade students in three California high schools [Doctoral dissertation]. University of La Verne, California. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304648009?accountid=9851 http://tf5lu9ym5n.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+A%26I&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertatio
  10. Stevenson, III, H. L., & Brooks, II S. L. (1999). An analysis of requiring school uniforms and its impact on student behavior: Implications for school reform [Doctoral dissertation]. Texas Southern University. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304545845?accountid=9851 http://tf5lu9ym5n.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+A%26I&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertatio
  11. Vaughan, A. C. (2001). The implementation of uniform dress policies: Student performance outcomes and perceptions of student impact at five public elementary schools in Hampton Roads, Virginia [Doctoral dissertation]. George Washington University. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2001-95017-007&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  12. Washington‐Labat, C. A., & Ginn, C. (2003). The effects of school uniforms on attendance and discipline among schools with and without mandatory school uniform policies [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Southern Mississippi. http://search.proquest.com/docview/305291517?accountid=9851 http://tf5lu9ym5n.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+A%26I&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertatio

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valdebenito, S., Gaffney, H., & Jolliffe, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Valdebenito, Sara
Venue
Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World
Published
2023-08-21
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
e1344-e1344
ISSN
1891-1803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386048485
Cited by
2
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Campbell Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
school exclusion, school-based intervention, student discipline, restorative justice, classroom management, cognitive-behavioural intervention, juvenile delinquency, youth violence, implementation barriers and facilitators, children and young people

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review