The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affective spaces: a praxeological outlook
Abstract
Classical social and cultural theory disregards the spatial and affective dimensions of social phenomena because of its anti-technological and anti-aesthetic bias. The first part of my paper digs into the reasons for this ignorance. Against this background, the second part outlines an alternative conceptual proposal, which I label a praxeological perspective. This approach offers a framework for analysing emotions and affects that simultaneously pays attention to artefacts and to space. It integrates all of these as basic components of sociality and, by doing so, avoids both the pitfall of their complete culturalisation and that of their total naturalisation. The aim is to achieve a basic ‘aesthetisation’ and ‘materialisation’ of cultural theory, instead. The third part, finally, illuminates the interconnection between emotions and space and argues that in order to explain the cultural change of affective structures in history, the analysis of the emergence of new artefact-space complexes is indispensable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collins, R. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400851744 · Cited by 4,726
Cited by
The sociology of emotions: Four decades of progress
Bericat, E. (2016) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392115588355 · Cited by 492
Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture
(2013) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac · Cited by 294
Zembylas, M. (2014) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1111/curi.12051 · Cited by 258
How Do I Carry All This Now?” Understanding Consumer Resistance to Sustainability Interventions
Gonzalez-Arcos, C., Joubert, A. M., Scaraboto, D., Guesalaga, R., & Sandberg, J. (2021) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242921992052 · Cited by 189
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Reckwitz, A.
- Venue
- Rethinking History
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-258
- ISSN
- 1364-2529 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1154
- OpenAlex
- W2015583375
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 213.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affective spaces: a praxeological outlook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13642529.2012.681193
- The paper
- Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective spaces: a praxeological outlook. Rethinking History. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2012.681193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.