How Do I Carry All This Now?” Understanding Consumer Resistance to Sustainability Interventions
Abstract
Given the increasingly grave environmental crisis, governments and organizations frequently initiate sustainability interventions to encourage sustainable behavior in individual consumers. However, prevalent behavioral approaches to sustainability interventions often have the unintended consequence of generating consumer resistance, undermining their effectiveness. With a practice–theoretical perspective, the authors investigate what generates consumer resistance and how it can be reduced, using consumer responses to a nationwide ban on plastic bags in Chile in 2019. The findings show that consumer resistance to sustainability interventions emerges not primarily because consumers are unwilling to change their individual behavior—as the existing literature commonly assumes—but because the individual behaviors being targeted are embedded in dynamic social practices. When sustainability interventions aim to change individual behaviors rather than social practices, they place excessive responsibility on consumers, unsettle their practice-related emotionality, and destabilize the multiple practices that interconnect to shape consumers’ lives, ultimately leading to resistance. The authors propose a theory of consumer resistance in social practice change that explains consumer resistance to sustainability interventions and ways of reducing it. They also offer recommendations for policy makers and social marketers in designing and managing sustainability initiatives that trigger less consumer resistance and thereby foster sustainable consumer behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consumers are increasingly held accountable for the broader societal impact of their individual practices across a range of consumption domains.
“Prior literature shows that consumers are increasingly held accountable for the broader societal impact of their individual practices across a range of consumption domains (Bajde and Rojas-Gaviria 2021; Giesler and Veresiu 2014; Gonzalez-Arcos et al. 2021).”
From Between Cultural Appreciation and Cultural Appropriation: Self-Authorizing the Consumption of Cultural Difference (2024) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Arcos et al. 2021
Cites
Consumption and Theories of Practice
Warde, A. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540505053090 · Cited by 2,682 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These five tenets of practice theory highlight how practices can guide social life and consumption (Warde 2005) and form the basis of our inquiry into consumer resistance to sustainability interventions in several key ways.”
BackgroundCreating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity
Giesler, M., & Veresiu, E. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/677842 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Poortinga, W., & Whitaker, L. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10030873 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…efforts to encourage sustainable consumer behavior with interventions such as water restrictions (Phipps and Ozanne 2017) and fees for using disposable coffee cups (Poortinga and Whitaker 2018) often meet various forms of consumer resistance (Gleim and Lawson 2014; Scheurenbrand et al. 2018).”
BackgroundThe Consumer Experience of Responsibilization: The Case of Panera Cares
Eckhardt, G. M., & Dobscha, S. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3795-4 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cruz, A. G. B., Seo, Y., & Scaraboto, D. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucad022 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“Prior research has identified backlash (Gonzalez-Arcos et al. 2021), discomfort (Eckhardt and Dobscha 2019), and paralysis (Cherrier and Tu¨re 2022) as ways in which consumers react to the call for adopting a responsibilized subject position.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationCreating Responsible Subjects: The Role of Mediated Affective Encounters
Bajde, D., & Rojas-Gaviria, P. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucab019 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gonzalez-Arcos, C., Joubert, A. M., Scaraboto, D., Guesalaga, R., & Sandberg, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Finis Terrae University (CL)
- Corresponding author
- Gonzalez-Arcos, Claudia
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-04-14
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 44-61
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W3123401273
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 26.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- UQ Global Strategy and Partnerships Seed Funding Scheme
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Keywords
- consumer resistance, sustainability interventions, social practice theory, plastic bag ban, sustainable consumer behavior, social practices, social marketing, environmental policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review