Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Through the rear view mirror: landscapes, legends and literature on the Australian road

Kerr, Rosemary·2013·Studies in Travel Writing

Abstract

This essay explores the way Australians have approached motoring journeys from the early to late twentieth century through analysis of both published and unpublished non-fiction travel narratives. It argues that an increasing tension is evident between the desire to embrace an emerging modern urban industrial Australia and its representative technology, including the motor vehicle, and nostalgia for an earlier, fading rural-pastoral era. While travellers embraced the motor car as the ideal means by which to discover the ‘real’ Australia in outback and rural regions, many also expressed ambivalence and resistance towards the new technology and the transformations it wrought. That ambivalence was manifested in a tendency to look backwards, continually seeking to perpetuate national foundation mythologies such as the bush and pioneer ‘frontier’ legends in the face of modernising modes and conditions of travel. Australia's history as a settler colonial society has strongly shaped experiences and representations of road travel in the motoring era. A study of road narratives provides an insight into the relationship between travellers, vehicles and the road, revealing changing attitudes towards modernity, landscape and nation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13645145.2013.783960

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kerr, R.
Venue
Studies in Travel Writing
Published
2013-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
188-206
ISSN
  • 1364-5145
  • 1755-7550
Cited by
6
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review