Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 576

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

(Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis

Open access
Braun, Virginia, Clarke, Victoria·2016·International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Abstract

One of us (VC) was having a conversation with a student recently about the origins and history of thematic analysis (TA). The student had read Qualitative Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy ...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Boyatzis R. E., 1998, Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development
  2. Braun V., 2013, Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners
  3. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005455 · DOI
  4. 10.3109/09593980903423012 · DOI
  5. Clarke V., Research methods for applied psychologists: Design, analysis and reporting
  6. 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000173 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/019394590002200308 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005457 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.4135/9781483384436 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005456 · DOI
  12. Joffe H., 2012, Qualitative methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners, 209
  13. Kinsella K., 2016, Prison Service Journal, 223, 11
  14. 10.1177/104973200129118183 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1348/014466500163031 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/1049732312450368 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
Venue
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2016-06-16
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
739-743
ISSN
  • 1364-5579 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5300
OpenAlex
W2426090710
Cited by
576
References
7
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.