The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation
Abstract
Traditionally, the classes in thematic maps have been treated as crisp sets, using classical set theory. In this formulation, map classes are assumed to be mutually exclusive and exhaustive. This approach limits the ability of thematic maps to represent the continuum of variation found in most landscapes. Substitution of fuzzy sets allows more flexibility for treatment of map classes in the areas of accuracy assessment and area estimation. Accuracy assessment methods based on fuzzy sets allow consideration of the magnitude of errors and assessment of the frequency of ambiguity in map classes. An example of an accuracy assessment from a vegetation map of the Plumas National Forest illustrates the implementation of these methods. Area estimation based on fuzzy sets and using accuracy assessment data allows estimation of the area of classes as a function of levels of class membership. The fuzzy area estimation methods are an extension of previous methods presented by Card (1982). One interesting result is that the sum of the areas of the classes in a map need not be unity. This approach allows a wider range of queries within a GIS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance
Lu, D., & Weng, Q. (2007) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160600746456 · Cited by 3,402
Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies
VERBURG, P. H., NEUMANN, K., & NOL, L. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02307.x · Cited by 624
Li, M., Zang, S., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Wu, C. (2014) · European Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.5721/eujrs20144723 · Cited by 538
Validation of the global land cover 2000 map
Mayaux, P., Eva, H., Gallego, J., Strahler, A. H., Herold, M., Agrawal, S., Naumov, S., De Miranda, E. E., Di Bella, C. M., Ordoyne, C., et al. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2006.864370 · Cited by 299
Hoffman‐Hall, A., Puett, R., Silva, J. A., Chen, D., Baer, A., Han, K. T., Han, Z. Y., Thi, A., Htay, T., Thein, Z. W., et al. (2020) · GeoHealth · doi:10.1029/2020gh000299 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodcock, C. E., & Gopal, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geographical Information Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-03-13
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-172
- ISSN
- 0269-3798 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-8816
- 1362-3087
- OpenAlex
- W2073358046
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/136588100240895
- The paper
- Woodcock, C. E., & Gopal, S. (2000). Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588100240895
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.