The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality assessment for building footprints data on OpenStreetMap
Abstract
In the past two years, several applications of generating three-dimensional (3D) buildings from OpenStreetMap (OSM) have been made available, for instance, OSM-3D, OSM2World, OSM Building, etc. In these projects, 3D buildings are reconstructed using the buildings’ footprints and information about their attributes, which are documented as tags in OSM. Therefore, the quality of 3D buildings relies strongly on the quality of the building footprints data in OSM. This article is dedicated to a quality assessment of building footprints data in OSM for the German city of Munich, which is one of the most developed cities in OSM. The data are evaluated in terms of completeness, semantic accuracy, position accuracy, and shape accuracy by using building footprints in ATKIS (German Authority Topographic–Cartographic Information System) as reference data. The process contains three steps: finding correspondence between OSM and ATKIS data, calculating parameters of the four quality criteria, and statistical analysis. The results show that OSM footprint data in Munich have a high completeness and semantic accuracy. There is an offset of about four meters on average in terms of position accuracy. With respect to shape, OSM building footprints have a high similarity to those in ATKIS data. However, some architectural details are missing; hence, the OSM footprints can be regarded as a simplified version of those in ATKIS data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The world’s user-generated road map is more than 80% complete
Barrington-Leigh, C., & Millard-Ball, A. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180698 · Cited by 462
Generating 3D city models without elevation data
Biljecki, F., Ledoux, H., & Stoter, J. (2017) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.001 · Cited by 165
Learning from urban form to predict building heights
Milojevic-Dupont, N., Hans, N., Kaack, L. H., Zumwald, M., Andrieux, F., de Barros Soares, D., Lohrey, S., Pichler, P.-P., & Creutzig, F. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242010 · Cited by 93
Zhuo, X., Fraundorfer, F., Kurz, F., & Reinartz, P. (2018) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs10040624 · Cited by 38
Rethinking the Buffering Approach for Assessing OpenStreetMap Positional Accuracy
Zhou, Q. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57336-6_30 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, H., Zipf, A., Fu, Q., & Neis, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geographical Information Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-27
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 700-719
- ISSN
- 0269-3798 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-8816
- 1362-3087
- OpenAlex
- W2039530979
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 223.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality assessment for building footprints data on OpenStreetMap. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13658816.2013.867495
- The paper
- Fan, H., Zipf, A., Fu, Q., & Neis, P. (2014). Quality assessment for building footprints data on OpenStreetMap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.867495
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.